root@OpenWrt:~# stty -F /dev/tts/1 -a
speed 19200 baud; rows 0; columns 0; line = 0;
intr = ^C; quit = ^\; erase = ^?; kill = ^U; eof = ^D; eol = <undef>;
eol2 = <undef>; swtch = <undef>; start = ^Q; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; rprnt = ^R;
werase = ^W; lnext = ^V; flush = ^O; min = 1; time = 0;
-parenb -parodd cs8 hupcl -cstopb cread clocal -crtscts
-ignbrk -brkint -ignpar -parmrk -inpck -istrip -inlcr -igncr -icrnl -ixon -ixoff
-iuclc -ixany -imaxbel
-opost -olcuc -ocrnl -onlcr -onocr -onlret -ofill -ofdel nl0 cr0 tab0 bs0 vt0 ff0
-isig -icanon -iexten -echo -echoe -echok -echonl -noflsh -xcase -tostop -echoprt
-echoctl -echoke
I found the same kernel version as the OP which uses /dev/tts/1.
The pinouts on the pcb silkscreen in this EU model are rotated 180 deg, ie edge pins 4,6 & 10 instead of 3, 5 & 9. No difference in using either port.
Poking around with setserial package now..
root@OpenWrt:~# setserial /dev/tts/1 -v autoconfig
Cannot autoconfigure port: Device or resource busy
root@OpenWrt:~# setserial /dev/tts/0 -v autoconfig
Cannot autoconfigure port: Device or resource busy
root@OpenWrt:~# setserial -g -a /dev/tts/1
/dev/tts/1, Line 1, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x0000, IRQ: 3
Baud_base: 3125000, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
closing_wait: 3000
Flags: spd_normal
root@OpenWrt:~# setserial -g -a /dev/tts/0
/dev/tts/0, Line 0, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x0000, IRQ: 3
Baud_base: 3125000, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
closing_wait: 3000
Flags: spd_normal