Author Topic: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison  (Read 159358 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ypsinine

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
    • mockfjardvader.se
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #250 on: October 28, 2024, 05:57:32 AM »
Personally I recommend leaving the filter but, given the low quality of the one supplied with the EP sensors, to provide for its replacement no more than every 2 years, much then depends on the place where they work.

M.
Interesting. I am thinking to put the filter back on when I receive the S+M.

Do you know an online store that sells better filters for the EP sensors?

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #251 on: October 28, 2024, 07:15:19 AM »
Personally I recommend leaving the filter but, given the low quality of the one supplied with the EP sensors, to provide for its replacement no more than every 2 years, much then depends on the place where they work.

M.
Interesting. I am thinking to put the filter back on when I receive the S+M.

Do you know an online store that sells better filters for the EP sensors?

I don't know in your country but a a simple research on Google with "PTFE filters" Will give you all you need

M

Offline Jasper3012

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 439
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #252 on: October 28, 2024, 07:44:39 AM »
Again, what does absolute humidity outside of the shelter have to do with comparing a Barani MS Pro with a SmartCellino shield? @Bianconero (and Toby to a lesser extent), I’ve asked multiple times to stop the off-topic talk and yet you continue to spam the thread with it. Please just stop and open another thread if you really want to discuss this.

Offline Jasper3012

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 439
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #253 on: October 28, 2024, 12:43:20 PM »
Again, what does absolute humidity outside of the shelter have to do with comparing a Barani MS Pro with a SmartCellino shield? @Bianconero (and Toby to a lesser extent), I’ve asked multiple times to stop the off-topic talk and yet you continue to spam the thread with it. Please just stop and open another thread if you really want to discuss this.


 :grin: simply don't focus solely on T if you want to make a relevant comparison at your level (the rest we'll forget) so if you haven't understood the ‘objective of absolute humidity is to separate the measurement of humidity from the influence of the temperature error of the shields/sensors.
Well, it'sclear that with the massive T probe in your ‘Belgian’ station, you'd have to measure practically every second to compensate for its slowness and the inertia of all the matter that influences the measurement.
It is also to determine whether a shield accumulates dew or condensation overnight, which should be visible in absolute humidity measurements.

clearer than that sorry but I couldn't/no more

The thermistor I use is temp-only and this has been made clear multiple times so I have no idea why you keep mentioning humidity, it is literally completely irrelevant to the thread. To say the comparison isn’t relevant bc I don’t have a humidity measurement is pure nonsense. I’m honestly getting a little tired of all this now, it can’t be that difficult to just stick to the topic of the thread.

Offline Kallo78

  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #254 on: October 29, 2024, 03:29:50 AM »
Report of yesterday

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #255 on: October 29, 2024, 03:54:40 AM »
My data from yesterday

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

M.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #256 on: October 29, 2024, 05:22:58 AM »
I add a file that may seem OT and I apologize, but it is linked to a request made a few messages ago

It is the comparison, of yesterday, of temperature and humidity of the 3 sensors with different types of filters, the sensors are inserted in a Comet f-8004 solar screen with provision for 4 sensors, the sensitive part is at the same height.

- sensor without any filter
- sensor with sintered steel filter (Rotronic production)
- sensor with original ecowitt filter with about 1 year of exposure

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

I hope it can be useful, it has no scientific value, a much longer comparison with screen rotation would be necessary, it is just an idea of ​​the differences on a typical autumn and humid day.

M.

Offline tobyportugal

  • Senior Contributor
  • ****
  • Posts: 242
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #257 on: October 29, 2024, 06:00:49 AM »
I add a file that may seem OT and I apologize, but it is linked to a request made a few messages ago

It is the comparison, of yesterday, of temperature and humidity of the 3 sensors with different types of filters, the sensors are inserted in a Comet f-8004 solar screen with provision for 4 sensors, the sensitive part is at the same height.

- sensor without any filter
- sensor with sintered steel filter (Rotronic production)
- sensor with original ecowitt filter with about 1 year of exposure

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

I hope it can be useful, it has no scientific value, a much longer comparison with screen rotation would be necessary, it is just an idea of ​​the differences on a typical autumn and humid day.

M.

I'm going to answer that my compatriot won't be happy (humour).  ;)
Anyone who wants to can transfer there:
https://www.wxforum.net/index.php?topic=47127.0
To find what I regularly see in Portugal you typically need high humidity, radiant sunshine and little wind.
On Sunday morning I found the same conditions here in Belgium, so it's clear that the environment is a determining factor.
You're unlikely to find the same conditions in Switzerland (for example).
If I can find a slot before I leave for Portugal on Saturday, I'm going to fit a new EP and an unfiltered SHT35 in the same new Pro3
(I hope that the fact that the Pro3 hasn't been run in won't change the situation).
This point has also been overlooked, although 3 of us have had this problem.
Because of the large volume of the Comet, it may not be the ideal shelter for trying to reproduce this type of situation.
Also, the design is different, and the double domes have a lot to do with it; I have the impression that the black domes prevent thermal bridges.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #258 on: October 29, 2024, 09:06:56 AM »
but I wonder, why don't you use the post already proposed for all yours ramblings?
Is it that difficult for you?

M

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #259 on: October 29, 2024, 10:52:55 AM »
but I wonder, why don't you use the post already proposed for all yours ramblings?
Is it that difficult for you?


 :grin: Maybe it's just because you're also the one who comes to talk to us about the Comet, no? or my AI sometimes has bugs  :grin:

As a reminder, on your national forum, it wasn't demonstrated that this shelter had an air ‘evacuation’ problem (a phenomenon amplified with the SHT31 Davis) or am I mistaken?

Fluid mechanics is just a bit of rambling for your purist knowledge ? in the field okay those who try to measure correctly with averages /1 mn with constant 20s/1m/s, anything that is not capable of reacting as well, is by definition wrong in relation to this target reference. 

I'm not going to insult you by giving you a whole bibliography unless ......

Let's not even talk about your ‘sponge’ sensors and/or a Belgian PT with such a large 5.8 mm sheath capable of obtaining this constant 20s/1m/s in air with a thermistor in it

Anyway, I'm going to ramble on one last time, but I'm curious to know whether any ‘submariners’ reading this discussion about your new product would agree that smoothing out already slow equipment on top of fast equipment to see that it sticks on average completely distorts the real weather measurement ?

That's the question  :-P

I only referred to the Comet for the purposes of comparing filters, as I have no other screen designed for such a comparison.

Go ahead...

M.

Offline SterlingVASPC

  • SVSPC
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
  • i am THE marylander ever
    • youtube
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #260 on: October 29, 2024, 11:05:34 AM »
Hey guys, what are we talking about? ( too lazy to read all the comments )
SterlingVASPC est 12/25/19
Owner of 30+ Weather Radios
600+ subscribers
Local Station: KEC83 from Pikesville, Maryland
omw to GRLevel2 Analyst, new radio, others
Probably the only youtuber with KEC83 as their main

Offline Dvalente75

  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #261 on: October 29, 2024, 11:11:38 AM »
Yesterday report

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #262 on: October 29, 2024, 11:12:10 AM »
Go ahead...

 :grin: what? bibliography if yes, no blem, I'll be happy to prepare it for you  :grin:

No no, I don't need anything but thank you

M.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #263 on: October 29, 2024, 11:15:49 AM »
Yesterday report

Thanks,

From now on, Italian testers will send, if and when they want, the comparison data reports, there will be no further comments that go beyond the main topic

M.

Offline Jasper3012

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 439
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #264 on: October 29, 2024, 12:43:47 PM »
Go ahead...

 :grin: what? bibliography if yes, no blem, I'll be happy to prepare it for you  :grin:

No no, I don't need anything but thank you

M.

 :grin:  mio dovere  :grin:
on the fly, without worrying about institutional formalism, that should be more than enough for your expert knowledge ==> a little patience it is preheating a good cooking and I will serve

You really just have zero respect for other people’s wishes, don’t you? How many times have I asked you to stop rambling about irrelevant stuff and you just continue on, unimpeded.

Offline Jasper3012

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 439
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #265 on: October 29, 2024, 12:46:23 PM »
Hey guys, what are we talking about? ( too lazy to read all the comments )

We’re comparing the widely known Barani MeteoShield Pro with the new Italian shield “SmartCellino”. There’s been loads of unwanted and irrelevant comments so sorry for that, but the thread on the whole is definitely worth reading.

Offline saratogaWX

  • Administrator
  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9722
  • Saratoga, CA, USA Weather - free PHP scripts
    • Saratoga-Weather.org
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #266 on: October 29, 2024, 01:03:42 PM »
Go ahead...

 :grin: what? bibliography if yes, no blem, I'll be happy to prepare it for you  :grin:

No no, I don't need anything but thank you

M.

 :grin:  mio dovere  :grin:
on the fly, without worrying about institutional formalism, that should be more than enough for your expert knowledge ==> a little patience it is preheating a good cooking and I will serve 
Last straw.. @bianconero57 is now a moderated member .. posts have to be approved by a moderator before appearing.  Any pushback will result in expulsion.  His continued non-helpful posting is the cause.

Edit: 31-Dec-2024, bianconero57 has submitted a GDPR 'right to be forgotten' request, so his userid and all his posts/topics have been deleted from the forum.  The automated process cannot remove prior posts that were quoted by others.
« Last Edit: December 31, 2024, 10:21:26 AM by saratogaWX »
Ken True/Saratoga, CA, USA main site: saratoga-weather.org
Davis VP1+ FARS, Blitzortung RED, GRLevel3, WD, WL, VWS, Cumulus, Meteobridge
Free weather PHP scripts/website templates - update notifications on Twitter saratogaWXPHP

Offline Jasper3012

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 439
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #267 on: October 29, 2024, 01:06:56 PM »
Go ahead...

 :grin: what? bibliography if yes, no blem, I'll be happy to prepare it for you  :grin:

No no, I don't need anything but thank you

M.

 :grin:  mio dovere  :grin:
on the fly, without worrying about institutional formalism, that should be more than enough for your expert knowledge ==> a little patience it is preheating a good cooking and I will serve 
Last straw.. @bianconero57 is now a moderated member .. posts have to be approved by a moderator before appearing.  Any pushback will result in expulsion.  His continued non-helpful posting is the cause.

Thanks! Hopefully we can finally get back to the topic of the thread now. I’ll post an updated version of my stat table this eve.

Offline ypsinine

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
    • mockfjardvader.se
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #268 on: October 29, 2024, 01:13:50 PM »
Thanks! Hopefully we can finally get back to the topic of the thread now. I’ll post an updated version of my stat table this eve.
Looking forward to it. With stat table, do you mean from the start of your comparison until now?

Offline Jasper3012

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 439
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #269 on: October 29, 2024, 01:16:55 PM »
Thanks! Hopefully we can finally get back to the topic of the thread now. I’ll post an updated version of my stat table this eve.
Looking forward to it. With stat table, do you mean from the start of your comparison until now?

Yes, min, max and mean for every day from both shields. There probably won’t be too much to see to be honest, the shields are running very similar.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #270 on: October 29, 2024, 01:53:16 PM »
Thanks! Hopefully we can finally get back to the topic of the thread now. I’ll post an updated version of my stat table this eve.
Looking forward to it. With stat table, do you mean from the start of your comparison until now?

Yes, min, max and mean for every day from both shields. There probably won’t be too much to see to be honest, the shields are running very similar.

True,

I can confirm it, even though, as already said, my station is not particularly reliable, the data that are really interesting, namely the meteorological ones, are extremely similar.

There are aspects that still need to be explored further but, in general, SmartCELLino manages to return reliable data and in line with similar products.

In the objectives it is a screen created to make up for serious shortcomings in the professional field, I am talking about Italy of course, where old-design screens affected by obvious errors are still in use, or as an alternative in the amateur sector, also being able to count, in my opinion, on a good quality/price ratio, also considering the equipment of accessories, certainly not common

October, updated until yesterday

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

M.

Offline Jasper3012

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 439
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #271 on: October 29, 2024, 03:33:18 PM »
There we have it, a mere 0.01C difference in mean between the shields over the past 21 days.

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #272 on: October 29, 2024, 03:39:59 PM »
There we have it, a mere 0.01C difference in mean between the shields over the past 21 days.


Allow me a hint of envy for your temperatures, here we could still go swimming on the sea ;)

sorry for the OT

M.

Offline Kallo78

  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #273 on: October 29, 2024, 03:43:35 PM »
Data from today until recently

In the black circles, around 2 o'clock in the night, I think we can assume that the sensor without filter was "hit" by a breath of dry SSW wind that has monentaneamente made raise the temperature and reduce humidity.

After a night with 99% humidity in the orange circles, you can see that the sensor of the Siap, inside its filter, remained wet for longer than the other two and especially the sensor without filter which obviously "dried" first.
As the radiation and also the wind grew, the sensors were progressively aligned 

Offline Jasper3012

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 439
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #274 on: October 29, 2024, 03:48:47 PM »
There we have it, a mere 0.01C difference in mean between the shields over the past 21 days.


Allow me a hint of envy for your temperatures, here we could still go swimming on the sea ;)

sorry for the OT

M.

Haha, the temperatures here are nothing to be jealous of, they're shit. I'd much rather have a more continental climate with a proper, snowy winter. But it is what it is. Funnily enough, I noticed the temps you are having this October are more like what I get in July! The Belgian autumn is a very poor time for radiation shield testing, it's increasingly dark, windy and with regular cloud/rain, giving little difference between shields. But at this point, I'm honestly not sure there'll ever be significant differences between the shields, even in more "interesting" conditions, like a calm and clear morning or evening. Time will tell, as ever.

 

anything