Good morning
For a few weeks, I have been using a MB NanoSD in my Davis VP2 and am really pleased with it. Although only for a short period of time, it has been working perfectly. An impressive little piece of kit.
I am now wondering whether to replace it with a MB Pro. This would enable me to position the Davis console where I would prefer to have it (without needing a power connection) and the Pro would be sited in a more convenient location, too. However, having done a little forum searching, I see that there is a certain amount of discussion about (a) the Pros ability to capture the RF signal from the Davis ISS (compared with the console); and (b) general stability, occasional data loss and the possibility of needing reboots or even power-off restarts.
So I would appreciate hearing any thoughts or, in particular, experiences on either of these points.
Two other points I should mention:
The console is currently sited approx. 80m away from the ISS, with line of sight through a double-glazed window. However, I would position the Pro, if I get one, a similar distance away but in a timber frame garage, so the signal would have to pass through (reasonably thin) layers of wood cladding and plasterboard. One thing I could try, before taking the plunge with the Pro, is to check the signal strength in the garage on the Davis console. Another option would be an external aerial (mounted on the outside wall), although I would prefer not to have to do that.
The garage is unheated so, in the winter, could be several degrees (both F and C
) below freezing. The location is in the NW Scottish Highlands, but some distance from the coast, at just under 200m asl.
Many thanks in advance for all replies.
Andrew