JohnD-
Don't get me wrong. I am not on a rant about evil corporate types exploiting its customers. But, in general, when companies make products most efficiently and at the lowest cost, both the company and its customers benefit. It is supposed to work that way. No charity involved here, just the natural workings of the marketplace. I perceive the 6313 as an attempt by Davis to modernize its products, which is a good thing (much like nautical navigation instrumentation going from Loran to GPS - the VP2 reminds me of my old clunky Loran receiver). I am questioning the strategy of in-house development of a stripped-down tablet when it might be far more economic to avoid display development and go with an existing inexpensive, widely-available product. Much of this tends to look like Davis trying to drive customers to use the premium (i.e., not for free) Davis cloud services even when they do not really need that. I don't know if the 6313 is a stripped-down Android OS (cannot tell from the T&C's), but if it is not, the cost for Davis to develop its own OS is substantial and the customer has to pay for that. Again, my $100 Samsung tablet has about twice the display area as the 6313 and probably a lot more horsepower and memory. Why do OS development when Android and other tablet manufacturers have already done it and spit out updates regularly. Much better to put the work into a separate data interface and Android (and Windows 11) apps. If Davis does not do it, someone else probably will.