The sensors will all be easily within 200 ft so distance shouldn't be a problem.
If it ever would be a problem, I could easily add the Weather Link Live.
I like using Weather Underground because of their fast 15 second updates.
I really like watching my weather updates in real-time!
Cost is not a problem, so is this then the best solution do you think?
I would be getting the Ambient Weather WeatherBridge Pro (red model).
I see in your description that you are using a meteobridge?
How do you like it? Can you use it to log your data to your PC?
Do you find any drawbacks?
With the Meteobridge Pro Red you will not be able to upload to Weatherlink.com (unless you also have a Davis logger). But again like you said...you could always add it later by getting the WLL. I feel that the Meteobridge is a great device to upload to a very great amount of different online services. The Meteobridge is also very reliable in terms of uptime, it is small, and it draws insignificant amount of power and makes no noise. You don't need to worry about Windows updates and the logging of software not restarting. There are other solutions to this like a Raspberry Pi running other software though, so I'm not discounting those other solutions. I'm just saying that yes, the Meteobridge does a lot right. You can also always expand to add additional software if you want. I don't see a drawback to the Meteobridge because I actually also run Cumulus MX, Weather-Display, and WeeWX.
You asked about logging the data to PC with the Meteobridge. Well yes the Meteobridge can help you do that in several ways.
- You can save to a mySQL database for backup
- You could run Weather-Display to pull live data from the Meteobridge directly (no Davis logger required).
- You can FTP or HTTP data to PC and run different weather templates (or make them public if you run a public web server)
- and other things like email, twitter, ...and more.