So parsing It's fairly simple stuff, ... greater cold air mass will move either whether more or less quickly east where looking at its more longitudinally potential, while at the same time, either whether being caused to recede more northward or spread more south where looked at more latitudinally. And in either case, where and with considering the basic timeframes that I've pointed to.
and removing the parenthetical expressions results in
It's fairly simple stuff, ... greater cold air mass will move east [and] either recede more northward or spread more south [in the] basic timeframes that I've pointed to.
As you say above, what you are posting is for discussion -- it would be easier for us to enter said discussion if your meaning was quickly understandable. It is your phrasing and qualifying parenthetical expressions that make it hard to tease the meaning from your sentences -- that is the main feedback I was trying to give you.
hello again Ken.
— Appreciate your time.
Alright, for discussion sake then, ...
Although, with respect, in point of fact I'm finding your assessment, or perhaps better said, characterization of my input, here above, somewhat arbitrary.
.. With this that you've pointed to above not having to do with actual colder air movement, perhaps you could run the same process that you have here, on my most recent projection submitted. This, so that I can view what you've noted more specifically where considering it -perhaps.
I've included a copy of it below, slightly changed with the various scrutiny that its been exposed to since my having originally posted it. This, if with my not having changed any of the main and fairly, in my own view leastwise, general ideas that I'd hoped to convey with it.
— Within the second short section showing here, I've added the phrase "with this idea", followed by a comma, following "and if". Beyond this addition, each of the changes that I've made further have been to the statement of clarification that I'd added, addressing my use of the phrase "colder air". Here, I've omitted one comma, with having inserted one otherwise, elsewhere within the section. This, with my having added an [ing]—which I'd inadvertently forgot—to the word "be", preceding "influential". These changes, along with my additionally having taken out the word "the", before "its movement"—with my not having done so where and when I'd initially proof-read the submission. I suppose I could have omitted the word "with" preceding "its various movement", but have elected not to. — Posted
originally at 22:02z for the 28th of April.
As I'd suggested
above, at this point I'm estimating that main colder air mass looked at more broadly, will begin to retract daily more northward for several days, …
This, with its being caused to move more slowly eastward through May 2nd or so, before beginning to move somewhat at least, more assertive east daily, and if with this idea, through a steadily higher latitude corridor.
— Also, important to note here at this seasonal point with looking at the idea of "colder air", in fact I'm using the term more relatively. And so, with this idea, and even with its various movement looked at still certainly being influential where looking different types of weather possible with warmer weather, in many cases where considering its movement, it can be thought of more simply as just "cooler" air mass, more moderating.
No "Numerical Wx-forecast Models" have been consulted where considering the generation of the general outlook included above as part of this post. 
