You might check this out:
Complex or clickbait?: The problematic Media Bias Chart,
https://acrlog.org/2021/02/23/complex-or-clickbait-the-problematic-media-bias-chart/But then, probably not if the chart backs up what you already want to believe.
If you want to believe that the current administration's energy policies and stated goal to destroy petroleum has nothing to do with the price of fuel, and that to say otherwise is a conspiracy theory, you'll do that.
If you really want to believe that the current administration's weakness has nothing to do with Russia's actions, and to say otherwise is a conspiracy theory, you'll do that.
And I'm sure you'll still say that to suggest we overreacted in fear to COVID despite all the obvious consequences, while at the same time refusing to investigate the origin, is a ''conspiracy theory".
And while you pick and choose what you want to believe, even if you can't refute the "conspiracy theories" with actual facts, and not just pointing to other biased news sources or even "fact checkers", you'll still consider yourselves to be intellectually and morally superior to those who don't automatically swallow the party line.
This kind of mindlessness and its destructive results repeats itself throughout history. But then, man learns from history that man learns nothing from history.