Author Topic: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison  (Read 119917 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #725 on: April 09, 2025, 02:30:07 AM »
Good morning, after a break due to family problems, I attach yesterday's report, zipped, in the comparison there continue to be the ecowitt ds18b20 that we are testing with great satisfaction

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

M.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #726 on: April 14, 2025, 02:44:12 AM »
Yesterday's report

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

M.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #727 on: April 15, 2025, 03:32:32 AM »
Yesterday's report, another rainy day

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

M.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #728 on: April 15, 2025, 02:49:06 PM »
Second part of today interesting in its dynamism
here, in such situations, not affected by errors, for example radiative, you can appreciate the different time constants

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

Always hoping someone is still interested to this tests and, after all, to improve his knowledge

M.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #729 on: April 16, 2025, 03:14:33 AM »
Yesterday's report

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

M.

Offline mauro63

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Barani MS Pro vs SmartCellino radiation shield comparison
« Reply #730 on: April 17, 2025, 09:34:43 AM »
Greetings to all,

I am updating the post to communicate that the members of our metrology group, unanimously, have decided to suspend the publication of any comparison report.

This decision, which was painful, arises from the continuous and growing involvement of such data at a professional level, some companies, which collaborate with our small group of enthusiasts, use such data, appreciated for their quality, with a view to improving, where possible, the air temperature detection systems, and it seems to us that the time has come to interrupt their free use.

We thank all those who have followed the reports, we are entering the "heart" of the most profitable season in this sense and it seems to us that the time has come to put an end to what has been achieved so far publicly.

Thanks from me and from all the members of Metrology and Meteorology

M.

 

anything