Author Topic: DarkSky current conditions accuracy  (Read 1397 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daneast

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
DarkSky current conditions accuracy
« on: February 02, 2019, 08:09:58 AM »
Hey wx folks. I've switched over to DarkSky in place of WU for a lot of my data (but I'm hoping to eventually transition to NWS once they finish their APIs that have been in beta for years).  Today I noticed quite a large deviance in current conditions for a given location.  I checked DarkSky against as many other sources as I could find for the current conditions for my town, and DarkSky indicated 5 degrees warmer than most (DarkSky reports 32F, where other sources are reporting 27F).  In another location in the region DarkSky is reporting 5 degrees colder (30F vs 35F).

I assume this might be due to the way they interpolate conditions between stations and what stations they are using.

I'm curious if those of you using DarkSky have made any observations about its accuracy.  Thanks!

Offline saratogaWX

  • Administrator
  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9244
  • Saratoga, CA, USA Weather - free PHP scripts
    • Saratoga-Weather.org
Re: DarkSky current conditions accuracy
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2019, 12:09:03 PM »
They don't describe exactly how they pick a station close to the lat/long of the forecast to display .. it may be as simple as the nearest one which could be a METAR or MADIS ingress station.  They do show the distance from the forecast point to the conditions point.

For my particular forecast point in Saratoga, the conditions appear to be from my station likely via CWOP->MADIS as the point is 0km away.
Ken True/Saratoga, CA, USA main site: saratoga-weather.org
Davis VP1+ FARS, Blitzortung RED, GRLevel3, WD, WL, VWS, Cumulus, Meteobridge
Free weather PHP scripts/website templates - update notifications on Twitter saratogaWXPHP

Offline ConligWX

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 836
  • #conligwx
    • conligwx.org
Re: DarkSky current conditions accuracy
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2019, 12:33:14 PM »
DS has been pretty good so far with reports and forecasts here. The have not noticed a big difference in unit values at all.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk

Regards Simon
Davis Vantage Pro2 Plus (6162UK) • Daytime FARS • WeatherLink Live • AirLink • PurpleAir PA-II-SD • CumulusMX •


Offline daneast

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: DarkSky current conditions accuracy
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2019, 09:50:16 PM »
So in the last week, after I released an update to my iPhone app that integrated Darksky weather, I'm seeing multiple cases in which Darksky forecast / current conditions are totally blowing it.  The issue is precipitation type.  My coverage area is the western part of Virginia. The forecast difficulty here in winter is almost always the type of precipitation we will get.

Last week Darksky predicted 2-4" of heavy snow, where no other weather forecasts said snow (and the NWS watch was for mixed winter weather - sleet, freezing rain type stuff).  For the entire day Darksky said it was snowing.  Minutely said things like "Heavy snow ending in 30 minutes", etc.  We did not get one flake of snow from that system.  The ground temperature was a little below freezing, and we got lots of rain, with some freezing rain with ice accumulation, which is very typical here.

Now today we are getting snow.  2-4" of it.  It is snowing right now.  DarkSky's current condition and minutely forecast: "Heavy rain for the hour".  The temperature is 36 F but we are getting snow.  As forecast by the NWS and others.

So I can only conclude that Darksky is extrapolating minutely type forecasts from radar, and naively determining the precipitation type by the ground temperature.

After some searching I came across this research document from 2016.  Darksky consistently ranked second to last (7th out of 8 ) in weather forecast accuracy.  https://www.forecastwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/Three_Region_Overview_2010_201606.pdf

I am in the process of reimplementing my backend to work with the new NWS raw forecast data.  I won't have "minutely" data, but the hourly has looked very good in my tests.  It is not great when a forecast is wrong, but it's downright embarrassing when the current conditions are totally wrong as to the precipitation type - all day long.

I just wanted to point this out for those using Darksky.  Perhaps in areas where the precipitation type is more simplistic (all rain or all snow) the accuracy is better, but for this part of the country, where cold often meets warmth, they have been exactly backwards in the precip type.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2019, 09:51:58 PM by daneast »

Offline pimohdaimaoh

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 300
  • "Be aware to our nature"
    • PIMOHWEATHER
Re: DarkSky current conditions accuracy
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2022, 10:00:04 PM »
DARKSKY IOS app will end it support this Dec 31, 2022 and support for API will end March 31, 2023 so what will happened to our DS-Forecast? is there any possible replacement before end its Darksky API support? since darksky for me is a good choice of detailing forecast compared to WU

Offline saratogaWX

  • Administrator
  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9244
  • Saratoga, CA, USA Weather - free PHP scripts
    • Saratoga-Weather.org
Re: DarkSky current conditions accuracy
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2022, 11:30:46 AM »
In the Saratoga template set, you can use either the Aerisweather or WU/TWC forecast scripts instead.
Aerisweather requires you submit PWS data to pwsweather.com to get an API key (see https://saratoga-weather.org/scripts-AWforecast.php).
Wunderground requires you submit PWS data to wunderground.com to get an API key (see https://saratoga-weather.org/scripts-WCforecast.php#WCforecast )

Both scripts are included with the current distribution of the Base-World template set.
Ken True/Saratoga, CA, USA main site: saratoga-weather.org
Davis VP1+ FARS, Blitzortung RED, GRLevel3, WD, WL, VWS, Cumulus, Meteobridge
Free weather PHP scripts/website templates - update notifications on Twitter saratogaWXPHP

Offline pimohdaimaoh

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 300
  • "Be aware to our nature"
    • PIMOHWEATHER
Re: DarkSky current conditions accuracy
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2022, 10:19:16 AM »
In the Saratoga template set, you can use either the Aerisweather or WU/TWC forecast scripts instead.
Aerisweather requires you submit PWS data to pwsweather.com to get an API key (see https://saratoga-weather.org/scripts-AWforecast.php).
Wunderground requires you submit PWS data to wunderground.com to get an API key (see https://saratoga-weather.org/scripts-WCforecast.php#WCforecast )

Both scripts are included with the current distribution of the Base-World template set.


Thanks Ken, I will add Aeris weather for list of my daily forecast

As I  scroll Aeris weather, theres a JSON also in which it can produce list of tropical cyclones, I hope theres I way we can integrate this also with google map scripts output


regards

-Mike-

 

anything