Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10 » Last Page
1
Just for curiosity's sake, may I assume that the 6100 WeatherLink Live can also receive all options such as solar, UV, FARS, rain bucket etc... readings via a 6332? Just like the 6313 can?

Yes, 6100 WLL and 6313 new console can receive any combination of sensors/transmitters on all 8 wireless channels. (As could the discontinued Envoy8X unit). Though there are still certain related concepts to be aware of. For example, a primary anemometer for calculating other wind-dependent parameters like wind chill - if there are multiple anemometers on a system then the console has to know which one to use for such calculations..

It is only the legacy 6312 and Envoy units that had limitations on which combinations of sensors/transmitters they could receive because of more limited computing power and memory in the older units.
2
I've been making sensors for some time now, even for VP2s.
If you want to modify EPs, you have to do it completely.
This opens the door to cleanly made dual sensors. To multi-purpose assemblies for 'all' shelters.
The disadvantage of an assembly without a filter is a faster risk of breakdown.
I've noticed that a SHT on a FARS has a shorter lifespan. It's a stupid idea to want to mount a SHT on a TS.
The SF2 solution is impractical if the PCB is not designed for it.
I think I'll soon be able to see the advantages of the 2 solutions.

https://www.meteopt.com/forum/anexos/1672291489977-png.3701/
https://filedn.com/lxtJY18lcdpH0L6MOjBnGBF/20230207_092222.jpg
https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZiHHc0ZC5v0SsfrWQp4deHHu0dthkotyHHk
https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZomHc0ZG5fEjYyEkHhDP8Mtd7J8FhFhgCPV
https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZITDeVZqmg1VmjRR4j96MX1HE2rVYCd7mYy
3
Hi Guys,

Just for curiosity's sake, may I assume that the 6100 WeatherLink Live can also receive all options such as solar, UV, FARS, rain bucket etc... readings via a 6332? Just like the 6313 can?


Cheers,

Shady
4
There appears some confusion in regard (wording?) what the 6332 transmitter can handle? In essence the 6332 (as was the 6331) is nothing more than a standard VP2 ISS PCB in a different housing. The 6332 (as such) is fully compatible and interchangeable with that of the so called 6152 ISS PCB as a standalone VP2 ISS.

You can certainly fully populate or partially populate a 6332 with an anemometer, Solrad, UV, Temp, Temp/Hum or rain collector and it will work/function exactly as an ISS does hence the above statement where you cannot use a 6332 transmitter for solar or UV sensors is rather misleading as worded. Where an ISS is being used with a separate anemometer then that is controlled from the console nothing to do with the transmitter (as such) same as the 6152 component VP2 ISS can be used as a stand-alone secondary transmitter for an anemometer or any other console allowed configuration, nothing to do with any transmitter design.       
5
As per my answer upthread, you cannot use a 6332 transmitter for solar or UV sensors for reception by a legacy 6312 console/receiver. (though the newer 6313 console is fine).

The basic rule is that the 6312 console can only receive data for sensors on a 6332 transmitter for which it is specifically designed and for which there is a sensor/transmitter option in the console settings. This includes a single alternative wind sensor or multiple temp/hum sensors. But it does NOT include solar/UV (or rain apparently, despite there being a rain transmitter option in console settings).
6
Very nice Shady.
I lived in the Pilbara for 22 odd years and although not that un-usual to see her as far north as Perth, it does not happen that often matey, well done.
I have lived now in Tasmania since 2006 and run a weather site, which auto captures the Night Sky East and South from our location on the North East Coast Tasmania.
Link here (with ref to the recent events, if you wish to have a look) : https://cumulus.hosiene.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=185124#p185124

Kindest Regards,
Tony
Thanks Mate for the kind words! I've also spent a fair bit of time in the Pilbara/Kimberly and we holidayed in Tassie during 2006. A stunning part of the world!

Your videos look amazing! We certainly couldn't see that much of the green colours where I am. (Truth be told I was getting sick with flu and we were stupidly jet-lagged after returning home from the UK on the direct London-Perth flight when the good wife alerted me at 2am that the aurora had kicked off... I stumbled outside in a brisk easterly wind and prescribed burn-off smoke in my pyjamas to get the shots. AirLink AQI had been up to over 1500 earlier so it probably wasn't the wisest decision! :-& :lol:)

(Strangely enough, I also signed up to the Cumulus Forum you linked just this morning as I'm looking into installing the software and running on macOS so I guess I'll see you over there too... if or whenever the verification email decides to finally show up (!)

All the best,


Shady
7
@ypsinine - Stevenson's Screnn (e.g. Metspec) would not be so bad). However, I think a better and cheaper choice would be the Davis FARS24H in your climate. It is easy to get a constant power supply, allowing for constant air exchange and no interruptions to the windmill, even when the sun is scarce or missing and does not reach the PV panel.

I bought my Davis FARS24H from here, you just need to provide a mount or buy a kit with a mount, links below: https://www.wetterladen.de/bestrahlungsschutzschild-6831-mit-24-stunden-aktivbelueftung?c=1140

https://www.wetterladen.de/Davis-6832-Temperatur-Feuchtesensor-mit-24-Stunden-Aktivbelueftung

This shop ships to all European countries by courier within 1-2 working days.

The important thing is that with the Davis FARS24H there will be a faster capture of air temperature change than with the WMO passive Screnn and Barani Gen III shield, which suffers at low sun angles. The Davis 24H does not suffer from this because it sucks air in from below.
8
mine yesterday data

 [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]

M.
9
In this image you can see, from the right, the original ep, in the center the ep with the rotronic sintered steel capsule, on the left the ep with the original capsule but without any protective filter

M.
Aha, now I understand, thank you (and bianco)! So there is a capsule with a separate filter inside it.
I thought the whole plastic part (capsule) was the filter.

I assume the behavior of the sensor changes without a filter (for example, faster response time).

@ypsinine - It's better to remove the filters completely from the Ecowitt WH31EP/WH32EP. Colleagues in Poland have been using SHT35 without filters in Apogee, Davis FARS24H, Barani for almost 2 years and the sensors are still working fine in these covers. The response time without the filter is heaven and earth.
Great information, thank you!

In your climate it is also worth thinking about a comparison shield to the Barani Meteoshield Pro III. I think it may generate more frequent radiation errors in yours, comparing to WMO Screnn Stevenson and Davis FARS24H. There will also be a faster response to FARS at night relative to the passive Barani shield.

We checked in the cold mid-year and in snowy weather the Barani Gen III shield generated significant radiation errors compared to the full-size Stevenson Screnn. The test with the WMO Screnn. coincided with the Apogee TS100 and Davis FARS24H. The Barani showed higher values by up to 1.5-2 degrees in sunny weather, snow and little wind (higher weather relative to the WMO Screnn). The climate here is different from that of Italy and Portugal, hence such shortcomings of the Barani, which the manufacturer does not want to mention anywhere and hides them scrupulously, but good WMO Screnn and active shields expose them.
Yes I am now considering getting another radiation shield. I have been thinking about a proper Stevenson screen because as you say my location (low wind, cold climate, lot of low sun) it may be a better choice than a smaller radiation shield. But I have a hard time finding sellers here in Sweden. I could of course order from somewhere in EU but my knowledge of Stevenson screens are very limited.

Edit: Davis FARS is also a good choice perhaps.
10
@ypsinine - It's better to remove the filters completely from the Ecowitt WH31EP/WH32EP. Colleagues in Poland have been using SHT35 without filters in Apogee, Davis FARS24H, Barani for almost 2 years and the sensors are still working fine in these covers. The response time without the filter is heaven and earth.

In your climate it is also worth thinking about a comparison shield to the Barani Meteoshield Pro III. I think it may generate more frequent radiation errors in yours, comparing to WMO Screnn Stevenson and Davis FARS24H. There will also be a faster response to FARS at night relative to the passive Barani shield.

We checked in the cold mid-year and in snowy weather the Barani Gen III shield generated significant radiation errors compared to the full-size Stevenson Screnn. The test with the WMO Screnn. coincided with the Apogee TS100 and Davis FARS24H. The Barani showed higher values by up to 1.5-2 degrees in sunny weather, snow and little wind (high-pressure weather relative to the WMO Screnn). The climate here is different from that of Italy and Portugal, hence such shortcomings of the Barani, which the manufacturer does not want to mention anywhere and hides them scrupulously, but good WMO Screnn and active shields expose them.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10 » Last Page
anything