The widget is replaced with yr.no meteogram
Its working now
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you meant that yowindow was displaying data for Brussels.
It was the yr.no meteogram back-up you talking about.
@Jáchym @all
When visiting a Leuven-Template site with a smart-phone => the small phone pages are displayed. No room for large gadgets.
When visiting a Leuven-Template site with a tablet or a laptop/desktop=> the normal site is shown.
But as not all devices support FLASH anymore so all flash scripts are loaded on top of a backup-background with similar data.
Behind the YoWindow there is another forecast => yr.no meteogram as a .png. If the device / visitor does not want or does not have Flash the Meteogram replaces the yowindow gadget.
Same for the realtime WD-Live if it is selected for the start-page. No flash means that a (sub)set of the steelseries gauges is displayed as an alternative. Same for WU flash gadget or Meteoware live. Those two are also realtime parts using Flash so they are replaced with gauges also.
If someone designs its startpage with multiple realtime parts, only one of them is replaced with the gauges, others are replaced with a one-line message.
@Jáchym => Flash discussions
Chrome:
As far as I understand Chrome is still supporting its
own version of Flash, it is only showing a one-time warning that the visitor must decide to use Flash.
Develop products for a profit:Without the possibility to get a payment no more "flashy" products will be developed. With HTML-5/Javascript there is no way to sell a product as all sources/scripts are un-compiled. Using a 'call-home' script to check if the product is licensed is a worse solution when the site who checks the validity is hacked or down.
Example: WD-Live is a very fine, very adaptable product. Most sites only use a very small subset of the possibilities.
No way this same level of professionalism can be developed for free.
Neither can it be maintained when all scripts are open to modification by the user.
When I started programming in 1969 I was using COBOL as one of the languages. Although multiple IT-watchers always predicted the end of the COBOL-era for at least 30 years, it is still used and maintained. So lets see if one can weed out the current bad version of Flash or that we have to live for another 10+ years with it. And I simply do not understand why a large company as Google keeps hammering out Flash as they could develop a safe to use version without even the smallest dent in their profits.
Wim