Hmmm...I reduced my H-field gains wayyyyy back to get more or less equal rates on the e-field and h-field. I'll have to try your method.
If you already have the H-field set to be just under the interference threshold, don't you find the addition of the e-field forces you over into interference unless you back down on the h-field gains? That seemed to be the case here....
Don
WD9DMP
No, not necessarily... I'm still finding my way around that... Generally, once I determine whether it's too many signals, or real interference... (always on H, very rarely on E, and then only 'burst') I almost immediately cut H field A back about half, since it's probably the old Axle factory... 90% of the time that's all I need do. Otherwise they get along very well...
Now, nearby cells,... I am becoming convinced that anything within 300miles, cut both back about half immediately... just too many signals... always had to do it, but most of the H fields were useless distortions... the E fields are pretty clean, even on very strong signals, and they'll present well even at a 1x2 gain.
I'm experimenting with sampling freq... got the (4-6 channels) running at 15 instead of default 28 just to see what might happen... Then I might mix in some 'number of samples before send" changes along the way, and see what effect it has.