Author Topic: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure  (Read 5591 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« on: December 20, 2021, 04:01:53 PM »
Hello, I'm a new owner of an Ambient WS-2902C weather station. I signed up, today, on CWOP and have been comparing my reported pressure to the altimeter setting calculated by the MADIS QC page. My readings are consistently 0.7 to 0.8 mb lower than the calculated value, and this is consistent with the difference I get using the Keisan calculator at https://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224575267.

I calibrated my REL pressure using Ambient's recommended method: using the pressure reported by the nearest airport. I used the altimeter setting reported by the AWOS (the "1 minute weather") rather than a published METAR. The resolution of this reading is only 0.01 in Hg, which is poorer than the 0.1 mb resolution of the reading reported by the airport station on ambientweather.net, but that report is updated only hourly, like the published METARs.

Is 0.7 mb difference too great for my station to pass MADIS QC? If so, how can I determine whether the problem is sensor error vs. incorrect calibration? I think a 0.7 mb difference is not too far outside the margin of error of the AWOS report, but is there a better source to use in performing this calibration? Or should I be using the calculated offset instead, ignoring sensor error?

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2021, 06:33:47 PM »
Is 0.7 mb difference too great for my station to pass MADIS QC?
No. That said, if you are calibrating to the altimeter setting, your equipment is incapable of calculating it. You can certainly be close, but you should be using SLP to be more consistent.

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2021, 06:46:37 PM »
Is 0.7 mb difference too great for my station to pass MADIS QC?
No. That said, if you are calibrating to the altimeter setting, your equipment is incapable of calculating it. You can certainly be close, but you should be using SLP to be more consistent.

I'm not certain what you mean. The Ambient 2902C cannot calculate SLP? Well, yes, it just uses the offset that I give it when I enter the relative pressure. Or it's incapable of calculating the altimeter setting? How much difference is there between SLP and altimeter setting? The airport only reports an altimeter setting via the AWOS, and that's the only *current* value I can get from it. It might report SLP on ambientweather.net, but that reading is nearly always at least an hour old. Where would you recommend getting a reliable (and current) SLP reading?

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2021, 07:00:10 PM »
Like I said, you can not calculate the altimeter setting. The difference can be negligible, or not. What AWOS four letter ID are you using?

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2021, 07:59:28 PM »
Like I said, you can not calculate the altimeter setting. The difference can be negligible, or not. What AWOS four letter ID are you using?
KMPV. Again, what source should I be using? Although KMPV is on ambientweather.net and an SLP reading (at least, I assume that's what it is) is given there, I've never seen a current reading from it there. It's always at least an hour old. And that station is about 10 nm from my PWS anyway.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2021, 08:01:29 PM by elisatems »

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2021, 08:20:51 PM »
Use this. Set your SLP when the newest observation comes out. Helps if the pressure is fairly steady at the moment and not windy as well.

https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?sid=KMPV&num=48

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2021, 09:00:18 PM »
Use this. Set your SLP when the newest observation comes out. Helps if the pressure is fairly steady at the moment and not windy as well.

https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?sid=KMPV&num=48

Perfect! They're hourly readings, but they seem to be entered fairly soon after each reading, so hopefully I'll be able to catch the next one while it's still current. Thanks!

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2021, 09:03:50 PM »
 [tup] Check back after a while for perhaps some fine tuning.

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2021, 09:59:25 PM »
[tup] Check back after a while for perhaps some fine tuning.
Yes, I suspect I'll have to, as the SLP at KMPV is currently dropping at > 1 mb/hr.

Offline gszlag

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 433
  • ..have you calibrated your barometer today?
    • Michael's Bay - Manitoulin Island weather
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2021, 02:27:40 PM »
Hello, I'm a new owner of an Ambient WS-2902C weather station. I signed up, today, on CWOP and have been comparing my reported pressure to the altimeter setting calculated by the MADIS QC page. My readings are consistently 0.7 to 0.8 mb lower than the calculated value, and this is consistent with the difference I get using the Keisan calculator at https://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224575267.

I calibrated my REL pressure using Ambient's recommended method: using the pressure reported by the nearest airport. I used the altimeter setting reported by the AWOS (the "1 minute weather") rather than a published METAR. The resolution of this reading is only 0.01 in Hg, which is poorer than the 0.1 mb resolution of the reading reported by the airport station on ambientweather.net, but that report is updated only hourly, like the published METARs.

Is 0.7 mb difference too great for my station to pass MADIS QC? If so, how can I determine whether the problem is sensor error vs. incorrect calibration? I think a 0.7 mb difference is not too far outside the margin of error of the AWOS report, but is there a better source to use in performing this calibration? Or should I be using the calculated offset instead, ignoring sensor error?
Welcome to the forum.

You mentioned using the keisan calculator. This calculator does not calculate Altimeter, You need a different calculator for that.

Although the keisan online calculators are popular and simple to use, we have to pay attention to the temperature starting point used in the calculator. The ISA (International Standard Atmosphere) assumes the default temperature at mean sea level is 15℃ and temperature declines as you gain altitude at the standard lapse rate of .0065℃ per meter.  However, the keisan calculators by default uses a non-standard temperature of 15℃ at your location/elevation/altitude. If you are calculating elevation offsets, the 15℃  needs to be changed to the ISA  temperature for your particular elevation.

Normally, I would use a ISA calculator to calculate the offset but you can still use a keisan calculator if you prefer. To calculate your fixed offset for your new Ambient weather station you need to use a different keisan calculator. It is called the keisan temperature and pressure at destination calculator. Make sure the default temperature is 15℃ at sea level and the default pressure is 1013.25 and set the altitude to 0 meters. Enter in your barometric sensor elevation and it will calculate both the ISA atmospheric pressure at your elevation (based on 1013.25 hPa at mean sea level) and the appropriate ISA temperature for your location/elevation. The difference between 1013.25 and the calculated atmospheric pressure is the elevation offset for your location.

Technically, none of the Ambient Weather, Ecowitt or their clone weather stations calculate Altimeter or Sea Level Pressure(SLP) directly. Altimeter or SLP are estimated using a fixed offset.

The keisan temperature and pressure at destination calculator will calculate SLP.

Altimeter is a bit trickier. You would think that there would be a true fixed elevation offset for Altimeter because Altimeter does not correct for temperature like SLP does. In reality, the elevation offset for Altimeter varies with Station Pressure.

I will go out on the limb here – and propose you use the same offset for now(as described above) for both Altimeter and SLP.

You will notice that the difference between SLP ( Sea Level Pressure) and Altimeter changes with temperature. This difference widens when it is really hot outside or really cold outside. This is because your AWOS/ASOS station at the airport is continually applying different temperature corrections depending on outside temperatures.

Getting back to your question regarding sensor error: To calibrate your barometric sensor all you need to do is subtract the offset you just calculated from the SLP reading from METAR (or other source) and the result is what your ABS reading should be showing in your display console. If not, you will have to adjust the ABS reading to match the calculated ABS amount.

Just be careful. When you change the ABS/REL readings make sure the offset amount hasn’t changed after all the button pressing is done. Going from memory here, change ABS first to what it should be, then change the REL amount to match METAR SLP. Check again that REL minus ABS = desired offset.

There is lots of reading on this forum on this subject. Do a search on “barometric calibration” for more information.

What is your elevation? We can crunch some numbers for you and make sure you have the right offset.
Ambient Weather WS-2000
Ecowitt WS3900 console
Ecowitt GW1000/GW1100
Ecowitt WS68: Anemometer, UV/solar
Ecowitt WH40: Rain gauge
Ecowitt WH57 Lightning sensor
Ecowitt WH32E: Outside T & H sensor
Stratus Rain Gauge (manual)
Raspberry Pi 3B+ (WeeWX/CumulusMX)
Raspberry Pi Zero 2W (WeeWX/MQTT/Belchertown)
---
Barometer wiki: http://meshka.eu/Ecowitt/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=barometer#barometer
---
http://weather.glenns.ca (pwsdashboard - live)
http://weewx.glenns.ca
http://glenns.ca/cumulusmx2/index.htm
---
Uploading to: AWN, ecowitt.net, Weather Underground, PWSweather.com, AWEKAS, Windy.com, WOW

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2021, 04:04:58 PM »
Hello, I'm a new owner of an Ambient WS-2902C weather station. I signed up, today, on CWOP and have been comparing my reported pressure to the altimeter setting calculated by the MADIS QC page. My readings are consistently 0.7 to 0.8 mb lower than the calculated value, and this is consistent with the difference I get using the Keisan calculator at https://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224575267.

I calibrated my REL pressure using Ambient's recommended method: using the pressure reported by the nearest airport. I used the altimeter setting reported by the AWOS (the "1 minute weather") rather than a published METAR. The resolution of this reading is only 0.01 in Hg, which is poorer than the 0.1 mb resolution of the reading reported by the airport station on ambientweather.net, but that report is updated only hourly, like the published METARs.

Is 0.7 mb difference too great for my station to pass MADIS QC? If so, how can I determine whether the problem is sensor error vs. incorrect calibration? I think a 0.7 mb difference is not too far outside the margin of error of the AWOS report, but is there a better source to use in performing this calibration? Or should I be using the calculated offset instead, ignoring sensor error?
Welcome to the forum.
Thank you! And thank you for the very detailed explanation. A few points:

Quote
You mentioned using the keisan calculator. This calculator does not calculate Altimeter, You need a different calculator for that.
I'm really not interested in calculating Altimeter; I was using the local AWOS Altimeter setting in lieu of SLP since I didn't know a way of getting a *current* SLP value. CW2274's link to the NOAA mesowest page solved that for me (and now I realize that I could have used the most recent published METAR as well, as KMPV's METAR does also give the SLP in mb in the standard format, at least most of the time).

Quote
Although the keisan online calculators are popular and simple to use, we have to pay attention to the temperature starting point used in the calculator. The ISA (International Standard Atmosphere) assumes the default temperature at mean sea level is 15℃ and temperature declines as you gain altitude at the standard lapse rate of .0065℃ per meter.  However, the keisan calculators by default uses a non-standard temperature of 15℃ at your location/elevation/altitude. If you are calculating elevation offsets, the 15℃  needs to be changed to the ISA  temperature for your particular elevation.
Wow, that's potentially a gotcha, depending on station elevation. I'm at 250 meters or about 820 feet MSL, so the keisan value would correspond to about 16.6 C at MSL using the standard lapse rate. Not sure how much difference that would make in practice, but it's definitely a deviation from standard.

Quote
Normally, I would use a ISA calculator to calculate the offset but you can still use a keisan calculator if you prefer. To calculate your fixed offset for your new Ambient weather station you need to use a different keisan calculator. It is called the keisan temperature and pressure at destination calculator. Make sure the default temperature is 15℃ at sea level and the default pressure is 1013.25 and set the altitude to 0 meters. Enter in your barometric sensor elevation and it will calculate both the ISA atmospheric pressure at your elevation (based on 1013.25 hPa at mean sea level) and the appropriate ISA temperature for your location/elevation. The difference between 1013.25 and the calculated atmospheric pressure is the elevation offset for your location.
If I understand you correctly, I put 0 m and 15 C "at present location" and 250 m "at destination", with a sea level pressure of 1013.25 hPa. Is that correct?

If so, the keisan calculator tells me my ISA temperature is 13.38 C and my atmospheric pressure is 983.57 hPa, for an offset of 29.68 hPa. Does that sound right?

For the record, my current offset in my Ambient is 29.8 hPa.

Quote
Technically, none of the Ambient Weather, Ecowitt or their clone weather stations calculate Altimeter or Sea Level Pressure(SLP) directly. Altimeter or SLP are estimated using a fixed offset.
And my WS-2902C doesn't read Altimeter at all - again, my only reason for using the AWOS altimeter setting was that it was current, and I (wrongly) thought the difference between Altimeter and SLP would be negligible.

Quote
You will notice that the difference between SLP ( Sea Level Pressure) and Altimeter changes with temperature. This difference widens when it is really hot outside or really cold outside. This is because your AWOS/ASOS station at the airport is continually applying different temperature corrections depending on outside temperatures.
This is fascinating to me but I do not understand it. Is this because of assumptions that altimeters make in translating pressure differences into altitude differences? My airplane seems to have a fairly well-calibrated altimeter, so if I use the altimeter setting given by the AWOS on the ground, the altimeter reads the correct airport elevation to within about + or - 25 feet... pretty much at any temperature over a wide range (say -20 C up to about 35 C).

Quote
Getting back to your question regarding sensor error: To calibrate your barometric sensor all you need to do is subtract the offset you just calculated from the SLP reading from METAR (or other source) and the result is what your ABS reading should be showing in your display console. If not, you will have to adjust the ABS reading to match the calculated ABS amount.
This makes sense. The reason I hesitate is that I'm not sure how much I can trust a SLP reading from an airport that's ~ 10 nm away and about 80 meters higher than my elevation, and is usually at least 5 minutes old - we've been seeing pressure changes of about 2 hPa per hour lately, not really rapid but fast enough that I'm not sure my sensor would be any more accurate after calibration than before. I really don't want to calibrate ABS unless I have a current value I can trust.

Quote
Just be careful. When you change the ABS/REL readings make sure the offset amount hasn’t changed after all the button pressing is done. Going from memory here, change ABS first to what it should be, then change the REL amount to match METAR SLP. Check again that REL minus ABS = desired offset.
IOW, first calculate the correct ABS using the SLP from the METAR and the calculated offset, then set it, then set REL and double check the offset. If I decide to do this, that's what I'll do.

Quote
There is lots of reading on this forum on this subject. Do a search on “barometric calibration” for more information.

What is your elevation? We can crunch some numbers for you and make sure you have the right offset.
Thanks again!

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2021, 05:13:51 PM »

The reason I hesitate is that I'm not sure how much I can trust a SLP reading from an airport that's ~ 10 nm away and about 80 meters higher than my elevation,
I suggest that the next time you head out to the airport, take your console (or whatever ambient calls it) with you and set it then and there.

Offline ocala

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 4396
  • The blues had a baby and named it rock n roll
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #12 on: December 21, 2021, 05:54:23 PM »
Use this. Set your SLP when the newest observation comes out. Helps if the pressure is fairly steady at the moment and not windy as well.

https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?sid=KMPV&num=48
This site also has 5 minute updates. Look at the top.

Offline ocala

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 4396
  • The blues had a baby and named it rock n roll
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #13 on: December 21, 2021, 05:56:29 PM »
I used a similar site to set my Davis  with CW2274's help. Mine has been pretty much spot on ever since.

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #14 on: December 21, 2021, 05:57:36 PM »
Use this. Set your SLP when the newest observation comes out. Helps if the pressure is fairly steady at the moment and not windy as well.

https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?sid=KMPV&num=48
This site also has 5 minute updates. Look at the top.
True, but only the altimeter is updated that frequently. SLP is only at the normal hourly obs.

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2021, 06:01:01 PM »
I suggest that the next time you head out to the airport, take your console (or whatever ambient calls it) with you and set it then and there.

Not sure what you're suggesting I should set at the airport. I could calibrate ABS there, that's true, and it would probably be the best place to do it. Then back at my station I could use the computed offset (29.68 hPa if I did the calculation correctly) to set REL, and ignore the airport SLP from then on. Is that what you mean?

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2021, 06:05:05 PM »
Use this. Set your SLP when the newest observation comes out. Helps if the pressure is fairly steady at the moment and not windy as well.

https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?sid=KMPV&num=48
This site also has 5 minute updates. Look at the top.

The airport AWOS actually updates every 2 minutes... but it does NOT report SLP or ABS pressure that often, only altimeter setting, as CC2274 said.

Oh wait... the site DOES report ABS (I assume that's what Station Pressure is) every 5 minutes. Cool!

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2021, 06:07:03 PM »
Sure ABS, but why can't you set SLP there as soon as the hourly obs comes out? I may be missing something since I fortunately never have to deal with this "stuff".

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2021, 06:08:17 PM »
Use this. Set your SLP when the newest observation comes out. Helps if the pressure is fairly steady at the moment and not windy as well.

https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?sid=KMPV&num=48
This site also has 5 minute updates. Look at the top.
the site DOES report ABS (I assume that's what Station Pressure is) every 5 minutes.
Yes.

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #19 on: December 21, 2021, 06:09:33 PM »
Sure ABS, but why can't you set SLP there as soon as the hourly obs comes out? I may be missing something since I fortunately never have to deal with this "stuff".
Wouldn't the unit then just stupidly use the offset from that setting wherever it was? Remember, the airport is 300 feet higher than my station.

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #20 on: December 21, 2021, 06:12:16 PM »
Sure ABS, but why can't you set SLP there as soon as the hourly obs comes out? I may be missing something since I fortunately never have to deal with this "stuff".
Wouldn't the unit then just stupidly use the offset from that setting wherever it was? Remember, the airport is 300 feet higher than my station.
Oh yeah, I forgot you can't enter elevation. :roll: Maybe ABS will do it. Certainly worth a try I guess.

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #21 on: December 21, 2021, 06:17:15 PM »
BTW, since you're a pilot and may know this, 300' of elevation is equal to 0.30 inHg, all things being equal. May be helpful in your setup.

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #22 on: December 21, 2021, 06:23:31 PM »
BTW, since you're a pilot and may know this, 300' of elevation is equal to 0.30 inHg, all things being equal. May be helpful in your setup.
Yes, that's the rule of thumb they teach you... and knowing that is why I was feeling a bit confused when you suggested setting REL at the airport. That's about a 10 hPa error I'd be incurring if I did that...

Offline CW2274

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
    • Conditions @ CW2274 West Tucson-Painted Hills Ranch
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #23 on: December 21, 2021, 06:26:54 PM »
Can't cha take ten out?

Offline elisatems

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Calibrating relative (corrected sea level) pressure
« Reply #24 on: December 21, 2021, 06:32:08 PM »
BTW, I recently asked on Ambient's Facebook group why they don't let you enter the station elevation and compute REL that way, and no less than Ed Edelman explained why. Basically, it's because you would still have to deal with sensor error and calibrating ABS if you wanted better accuracy, and they don't encourage users to do that. I think it just makes it harder to disentangle errors due to microclimates and distance from the SLP source from sensor error. But considering the low cost of the station, I can't really complain too much.

 

anything