No, "Your're not the problem"...
the issue you seem to be addressing is Lightningmaps data versus Blitzortung Data.... there are 'anomolies' and some 'thoughts' being collected and 'formulated' for presentation to the developers.. some of these should be obvious, but others are 'subtle', intermittent, and not necessarily 'obvious... especially when you have two completely different 'data' presentation approaches... LMO and Blitzortung.. for two different reasons... LMO being more directed with 'hardcore' analysis and experimentation, and Blitzortung' presenting more 'general' data... currently the two 'systems' are not speaking well to each other and Tobi (LMO) has been extremely diverted from the project because of 'vocational' and 'personal' demands for some time... as an 'experimental' and 'hobby' project concept, as defined, the data available is certainly not exploited to the depths possible, and there is a very small group of us experimenting with ways to suggest a "level Two / Three"
shift 'upward' if you will,,,,
after all, that's part of the 'experimental' approach...Let me attach a simple teaser "derived presentation' using a different 'processing' concept' just a hint...that might blow your mind.. but it's well down the road, currently,... and
I won't discuss further in this public forum.. except to say the attached are very simple, derived illustrative purpose and nothing to do with what will be actually available, probably on a very restricted, operator's only option ... hopefully... but it may be time to begin to 'come out of the closet' somewhat, and take this excellent project concept to the next levels..
NOTE: must be 'logged in" to see the attachments,... 
