I noticed that there were some fundamental differences between Red and "Green" in terms of frequency response, loading resistance and input structure. Aside from the obvious remote PGA control, I was wondering if any of these could be applied to the older "green" boards, specifically 6.8USB.
The Red has:
- Single Ended input rather than differential input
- 2.2KOhm input resistance vs. 1MegOhm input "termination" resistance for loading
- 50KHz LPF filtering vs. 17KHz or 34KHz jumper selection
I found that converting to "single ended" input (defeating the differential) was beneficial for reducing the residual noise. The input resistors on the "green" amp (6.8USB) were 1% tolerance, which means 40dB CMRR at best. I suspect that the common-mode noise with all the gain behind it was not able to reject the noise.
This was posted on the USATOA board:
Taking a tip from the new system RED, I decided to ground-reference the input on the "older" 6.8USB amplifier. (IA3/IB3 jumpers placed)
The 2nd step was to try reducing the input resistance to 2.2K Ohms. I made a jumper resistor that goes in series with one of the 82 Ohm resistors already on the board. The "single ended" jumper, made this an easy add on.
Here is the summary from USATOA:
Placed 2.1K resistors at IA-1 and IB-1. This puts 2.1K + 82 Ohms across the antenna. (2182 Ohms).
The VU meters on the Linux box dropped a few dB. I increased the gain from 53 to 70, putting the noise floor about back where it was on the VU.
While these two measures improved the noise rejection, the lack of the response peak due to the 2.2K resistance smoothed out the waveform. The "Green" was now performing poorly on the "Participation" chart on Blitzortung.org.
In order to change the frequency response from 17KHz to 34KHz, I removed the F1, F2 and F3 filter jumpers to change the response.
I decided to give this a try and open all the filter jumpers. I started getting an error in the plots on Lightningmaps.org for each strike. It seemed that I started getting more participated strikes, though. Then I placed just the F3A/B filter jumpers. At first there were some timing errors, but they stopped and I got the normal waveforms/frequency/Lissajous plots. Then the errors started appearing (>8000usec). I restored the filters back to original, and the errors stopped. See attached for the error.
Today, I tried again and got better results. I was not getting the errors on the waveform/frequency/Lissajous strike plots.
I ran a Bode plot of the filter response which revealed that with the 34KHz filter settings, there is a peak near 10KHz that is a couple of dB higher than the 17KHz filter settings. Today, I tried reducing the gain from 101 to 70x which is a reduction in gain from 40dB to 37dB. (I had bumped up the gain as an experiment)
I have been monitoring both the participation table and the waveform plots on LightningMaps.org are good. In fact, instead of being smoothed out, they more closely resemble the RED waveforms.
The final point, is when I check the box on the Overview plot for "668,706", I see many more strikes showing. I believe that this shows strikes that were detected by both stations. Before the filter change, there were very few that would show with this box selected. Now there are many strikes showing. The individual strike data on LightningMaps.org is also showing both of my stations much more frequently as well.
I'll continue to monitor the behavior with these new settings to check the long-term implications.
Greg H.