I won't have enough data for Twb based on what NOAA suggests as inputs. It certainly does bring a more comprehensive representation of "total uncomfortableness" into the mix.
In other news, I will explain how I "calibrated" the Anemometer (aka Wind Speed Sensor).
I had code for the "Fine Offset" anemometer that I purchased, but it was in kph and had been tested with Python code to determine an accurate WS function. Knowing that the kph readings were more than accurate enough (much internet searching) based on the function used and design of the sensor, I set out to correlate kph to mph.
I know what the mathematical conversion is between kph and mph, but to validate I get the expected results is a little more complex.
The set-up included a two speed hair drier with the temperature set to off. I positioned the nozzle such that it would be directed at the cups of the anemometer and took 5 wind speed measurements using all three "programs": Original code in kph, my code in kph (then converted to mph) and my mph code. I did not change anything except which code ran, (it takes 6 seconds per run) and recorded the results. I then set the drier to "Hi" and conducted the testing again as backup, using only 5x2 though.
For statistical purposes, 5 data points were taken from each program:
WS (original) kph: 10.09, 9.85, 10.09, 10.09, 10.09 ~ 10.04 avg (~6.22mph)
WS_mphV2 mph : 9.73, 9.79, 9.73, 9.97, 9.73 ~ 9.8mph
WS_mph_v6 mph : 9.76, 9.76, 9.76, 9.76, 9.76 = 9.76mph
Seeing that both WS_mph programs returned essentially the same erroneous readings, I elected to do two things: 1) modify the calibration from the original WS = 1.18 as carried over to 0.765 and 2) perform the testing on only the "final" code version of the WS_mph_v6 program.
Results:
WS (original) kph: 17.3, 17.3, 17.06, 17.3, 17.3 ~ 17.26kph ~ 10.70mph
WS_mph_v6 mph : 10.71, 10.71, 10.71, 10.71, 10.71 = 10.71mph
So I am SET in my anemometer calibration with the verified original WS in kph matching my code to within 0.01mph in 10.
No, I do not believe that is the true accuracy of the device, but for winds < 20mph, it should be accurate enough and better than what most commercial weather stations can do for 5x the cost.