Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
Wifi logger is a great bit of kit. Use it to feed my site...see link. It's connected to a Vantage Vue.





http://www.llanelliweather.info/index.php
72
I've switched from an all in one station to one with individual sensors so I can put my rain gauge in an easy to access spot and not my roof (you can see my old station top right).  Is this four foot fence post an ok spot for my rain gauge?  I know it's not ideal with the houses there but there's about 15-20ft clearance around the rain gauge and it has a clear view of the sky. 

73
...I guess for the meteorological community, my station elevation of 5818 feet (1773.33 meters) is considered high for this science...

It's not really that it's considered a high elevation for the science, but purely and simply a consequence of the fact that in order to get a sense of atmospheric pressure patterns on a large scale then pressure readings are everywhere adjusted to what the equivalent sea-level pressure might be. But the necessary correction to sea level pressure (SLP) is imperfect because a number of ultimately unknowable assumptions have to be made. It's also imperfect because there are both simpler but less accurate (Altimeter) and more accurate but more complicated (Standard) ways of calculating the correction. And the greater your altitude then the greater the impact of the correction; the greater the uncertainty involved; and the more the choice of assumptions in the correcting calculation becomes important.

Your airport reading is almost certainly using the simple Altimeter correction. So your best way of mimicking that correction is to use the same correction, which in the Davis stations is only easily** available from the Vue console.

**Actually IIRC the absolute pressure is available from the LOOP2 data record that most modern Davis stations with legacy consoles can also provide, but AFAIK (but please correct me if I'm wrong here) most software doesn't access that data item and also doesn't implement the necessary Altimeter correction. So I guess that software like CumulusMX and Weather Display could in principle generate both pressure values. But Weatherlink for Windows will presumably never do so because it is no longer being developed.)
74
Hi!

For the WS90 is a new firmware available: v1.2.8

Changelog WS80 Firmware V1.2.8 Upgrade 2024-04-15

1.Optimize wind speed measurement. To ensure accuracy with the upgrade, a recalibration tozero is required for it to take effect.

You may find these files also on the Ecowitt product page for the WS80.

Oliver
75
Hi!

For the WS90 is a new firmware available: v1.4.3

Changelog WS90 Firmware V1.4.3 Upgrade 2024-04-15
1.Optimize wind speed measurement. To ensure accuracy with the upgrade, a recalibration tozero is required for it to take effect.

You may find these files also on the Ecowitt product page for the WS90.

Oliver
76
So, to reaffirm the reason for my original post, I am using a Davis Weather Envoy + Data Logger to connect to my computer.  That Envoy uses the Standard/Barometric Pressure system instead of the Altimeter method used on the 6313 Console.  I am trying to get the Envoy to track and report Pressure readings close to what the local airport is using since I upload to CWOP.

The Davis Envoy/Data Logger does a good job of matching the swings in pressure up and down, but I'm just trying to fine tune the readings so they track closely.  I am over 300 feet higher in altitude, and I guess for the meteorological community, my station elevation of 5818 feet (1773.33 meters) is considered high for this science.  For this part of the United States, this is actually quite normal.  Perhaps I am being obsessive-compulsive, but just trying to report good data.  With the WeatherLink 6.0.5 software, you input both the correct elevation of the station,  AND the pressure reading from the local reference source.  That hasn't provided me good results.
77
What Weather Station Should I Buy? / Ecowitt Witt Boy With WH57 Misol
« Last post by fdweater on April 15, 2024, 07:53:47 AM »
I have recently purchased GW2000 Wi-Fi Gateway and WS90. It is working fine. I noticed that When I search for lightning detector, WH57 is listed in both Misol and Ecowitt brands. Ecowitt's brand is somewhat more expensive than Misol. Before purchasing, I just wanna verify from the member of this group these three things work together? And Will I be able to monitor the WH57 by Misol through Ecowitt.net / Ecowitt App?

Thanks!
78
Good point. Does the sensor itself have a maximum depth allowed? I plan to get moisture sensor from different depths. I believe it shares the same number of maximum sensors with WH51 right?

The manual indicates that the cable is one metre in length. They do recommend that the device be at least 20cm above ground, which would suggest a limit of 80cm in depth - but I'm sure you could experiment to see how low you can actually go and still have adequate RF reception.

As for the limit of eight sensors, that is per receiver (gw* or console.)  If you have a need for more than eight sensors, you can get an additional gw* device for every eight sensors, and then you will simply need to force registration of each sensor into the appropriate slot of the desired gw device, and of course you'll need to interpret the results appropriately.

Note that you may even consider getting some sensors on an alternate frequency, with the gw* on that same frequency.  As an example, I have eight WH51 sensors using 915 MHz, received by a GW1000B at 915 MHZ.  I then bought an additional eight WH51 sensors, but this time using 433 MHz, and a GW1000C also using using 433 MHz. They all peacefully coexist, and I simply have my software read sensors from both GW* devices and associate the data with the correct interpretation using the sensor IDs.  (I actually also have more 915 MHz sensors, which are received by a third GW1000B, but that's getting more complicated...)

   ---Jonathan
79
Hi!

Regarding the channels: yes, the WH51L shares the channels with the WH51 - so max. 8 sensors at all per device.
The maximum depth is limited by the cable length - the cable has a length of approx. 1 metre.

Oliver
80
Good point. Does the sensor itself have a maximum depth allowed? I plan to get moisture sensor from different depths. I believe it shares the same number of maximum sensors with WH51 right?
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10