WXforum.net
May 24, 2013, 05:30:34 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Members: 6619  •  Posts: 178759  •  Topics: 18135
Please welcome moranbahweather, our newest member.
Welcome to the the new hosting for WXforum.net.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Poll
Question: Should the NWS Modify their Advisory Language
It's ok as is. - 10 (62.5%)
They should change some of it. - 2 (12.5%)
They really need to modify it. - 4 (25%)
Who cares? - 0 (0%)
Foreign member (N/A) - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 16

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: National Weather Service Terminology  (Read 667 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
SlowModem
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4513


WX @ 26.4 kbs


WWW
« on: December 31, 2012, 12:39:49 PM »

The National Weather Service is looking into changing its usage of the terms "watch," "warning" and "advisory" while describing weather-related events.

Using an online demonstration — found at http://nws.weather.gov/haz_simp/ — the Maryland-based organization is hoping to garner feedback on its suggestions and to decide whether a change is necessary.

"We're running this demonstration to get a more formal, deeper comment process about whether there is an alternative to the system that will be more clear to everybody and still convey the critical information that we want to convey," said Eli Jacks, chief of public weather services.

"The primary reason for this demonstration is that we find that people get our three primary terms confused."

As part of its Weather Ready Nation initiative, the organization's goal is to clarify and simplify its 14 official product messages to better serve the country and help people prepare for inclement weather.

For example, instead of reading or hearing that "the National Weather Service has issued a winter storm watch", the agency is suggesting a change to "the National Weather Service forecasts the potential for heavy snow".

The term "advisory" would then be replaced with "the National Weather Service advises caution for," while "warning" would be expanded to "warning for a dangerous" followed by the weather event.

With a start date of Dec. 11, Jacks and his staff have received more than 1,000 comments so far from the online demonstration, with suggestions ranging from color coding to rewording the messages. The demonstration will run through March 31, 2013.

You can take a survey to express your opinions at:

http://www.nws.noaa.gov/survey/nws-survey.php?code=WHSD
Logged

Greg Whitehead
Ten Mile, TN

http://wattsbarweather.net

Sigdigit
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 491




« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2012, 03:34:24 PM »

I think on this forum the consensus will be it is fine as is.  We are not exactly the idiot general public.
Logged
chief-david
Educational Weather
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1264


Space Academy for Educators


WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2012, 03:35:13 PM »

The only people that are complaining are the ones that don't listen.
Adapt to me because I don't try to understand.

People want the information to tell them what to do instead of thinking for themselves.

Warning-watch-advisory all means turn on some media device and figure out what is going on.
Get your head out of your pocket and figure out what you need to do to stay safe.

Logged

Vantage Pro Plus 6163
Wunderground KMNMINNE28 
CWOP DW6947
Midwesternweather.net 
twitter @RMSWeather
Facebook 
Skywarn Stormspotter
Robbinsdale, MN 55422@ 45 degrees North Latitude.

http://weather.rms.rdale.org/
SlowModem
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4513


WX @ 26.4 kbs


WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2012, 06:58:27 PM »

Personally, I'm glad they're doing away with a watch.  I never thought two items that start with the same letter were a good idea.  I'm sure most of us here are a lot more familiar with NWS terminology that John Q. Public.  I'm a firm believer in the KISS principle (no, not the Gene Simmons kind).  Smile
Logged

Greg Whitehead
Ten Mile, TN

http://wattsbarweather.net

ocala
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1971



WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2013, 09:19:37 AM »

I doubt it will make a difference. People will still be confused no matter what language is used.
Look, what they use now is fine. If people cannot understand the difference between a watch or warning then it's their own fault.
Logged
Farmtalk
Fitzweather
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3526



WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2013, 11:17:10 AM »

Personally, I have always liked the advisory, watch, and warning thing. I think if they put a statement out like: "There is the potential for heavy snow tonight", people would be less apt to take it as seriously as "Winter Storm Warning is in effect".
Logged

"Make it simple but significant"

Administrator- www.fitzweather.com
Administrator- www.triviacre.com
W3DRM
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1347



WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2013, 12:51:51 PM »

For myself, I say "leave it alone". Why spend the time and "money" to do another analysis for something that only the lawyers really care about? Is someone afraid of getting sued because of terminology? Why can't we just let folks read and learn on their own? We've lived with the Watch, Warning, Advisory terminology for many years now and I really question "who" is confused. All of us on this forum have learned what the meaning of those designations means, why can't the general public?

Sorry for the rant but this is a good example of our country being so afraid of someone not understanding what is being said rather than putting the responsibility back on the individual to learn a few new terms on their own. We just can't continue to hand-hold the world...

Logged

Don - W3DRM - Minden, Nevada --- Davis Wireless VP2, VWS 14.00 p101,
StartWatch, VirtualVP, VPLive, WL 5.9.3, Win7 Ultimate-SP1
--- Logitech QuickCam Fusion webcam
chief-david
Educational Weather
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1264


Space Academy for Educators


WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2013, 01:38:22 PM »

+1
Logged

Vantage Pro Plus 6163
Wunderground KMNMINNE28 
CWOP DW6947
Midwesternweather.net 
twitter @RMSWeather
Facebook 
Skywarn Stormspotter
Robbinsdale, MN 55422@ 45 degrees North Latitude.

http://weather.rms.rdale.org/
fatoldladyinpjs
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6




« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2013, 05:02:21 PM »

I think it's fine the way it is.  Stupid people still aren't going to get it anyway.  And what's the point?  75% of the advisories and watches have been false alarms in my area anyway.  The NWS is constantly putting these weather alerts on our favorite online weather sites to warn/scare people, then taking them off like they never existed.  This is why I do my own forecasting.
Logged

Standing tall on North Dakota snow. A March blizzard nearly buried utility poles.
Caption jokingly read “I believe there is a train under here somewhere!”
Courtesy Dr. Herbert Kroehl, NGD collection. Photographer Bill Koch. March 9, 1966.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.111 seconds with 21 queries.
anything