|
|
|
|
|
miraculon
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2013, 05:50:54 PM » |
|
That is a nice project board. Keep us posted on your progress. What are you going to control it with?
Greg
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rdsman
Senior Member

Offline
Posts: 59
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2013, 07:21:09 PM » |
|
I don't really have a plan for them. I will probably just write some code and see if they work well enough to pursue a "real project" using one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kd7eir
Member
Offline
Posts: 3
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2013, 12:29:05 PM » |
|
I have a couple AS3935 Franklin Demo Board kits coming in the mail from Future Electronics. I will be evaluating these for making a realistically priced lightning detector for hobby use. There is really no reason for a lightning detector to cost hundred of dollars, it's just not that complicated to implement. My plan is to link the AS3935 with an ATMega microprocessor for display and analysis purposes. I believe that this could be produced for well under $100 USD for a basic system, and well under $200 USD for a multi-sensor system to allow for triangulation of the strikes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bushman
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2013, 03:16:39 PM » |
|
I have a couple AS3935 Franklin Demo Board kits coming in the mail from Future Electronics. I will be evaluating these for making a realistically priced lightning detector for hobby use. There is really no reason for a lightning detector to cost hundred of dollars, it's just not that complicated to implement. My plan is to link the AS3935 with an ATMega microprocessor for display and analysis purposes. I believe that this could be produced for well under $100 USD for a basic system, and well under $200 USD for a multi-sensor system to allow for triangulation of the strikes.
I'd be in for one of those! Keep us posted.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rdsman
Senior Member

Offline
Posts: 59
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2013, 07:18:32 PM » |
|
My plan is to link the AS3935 with an ATMega microprocessor for display and analysis purposes.
I2C or SPI? While the chip supports both, my BOB only does I2C, so I guess that I am leaning in that direction.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kd7eir
Member
Offline
Posts: 3
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2013, 07:33:00 PM » |
|
I definitely plan to use I2C for the interface.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rdsman
Senior Member

Offline
Posts: 59
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2013, 07:41:26 PM » |
|
I am leaning towards a stand alone lightning detector, with a USB interface. It would plot time /distance. The vertical line colors could change based on distance, intensity, etc. It could look something like the picture below:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kd7eir
Member
Offline
Posts: 3
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2013, 06:08:00 PM » |
|
I finally got the AS3935 demonstration kits in, so now I can start working on the code and getting some testing done.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
miraculon
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: April 16, 2013, 12:16:57 PM » |
|
Any further progress on these projects? Just wondering.
Greg H
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rdsman
Senior Member

Offline
Posts: 59
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2013, 12:42:58 PM » |
|
Any further progress on these projects? Just wondering.
I did get some code written that would do the calibration/sensitivity functions correctly. It can detect a grill starter and clasify it as a "Disturber". One big problem - No Lightning has been around since! So it's going about the same as my Si4707 Weather Band receiver project - I only get to test it on Wednesdays during the Required Weekly Test (RWT).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rdsman
Senior Member

Offline
Posts: 59
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2013, 09:45:24 AM » |
|
A line of thunderstorms came through yesterday and early this morning. They lasted just long enough for me to tweak my code. The screenshot below shows the results. I plan to let it run for a while, clean up the code, then I will post it for anyone interested.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|