WXforum.net
June 18, 2013, 06:43:45 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Members: 6695  •  Posts: 181331  •  Topics: 18405
Please welcome KD0RII, our newest member.
Welcome to the the new hosting for WXforum.net.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Tornado Complancency?  (Read 678 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
SlowModem
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4624


WX @ 26.4 kbs


WWW
« on: April 17, 2012, 04:08:44 AM »

Will people become complacent with better warnings?

Story here
Logged

Greg Whitehead
Ten Mile, TN

http://wattsbarweather.net

Bunty
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1013


Stillwater marks the spot.


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2012, 12:58:59 PM »

NO WAY!   One never knows when the day will come when he or she won't be spared from a tornado hitting when a tornado warning is issued.  The number of close calls Stillwater has had with getting hit again from a tornado since 1990 won't work to let my guard down.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2012, 11:25:52 PM by Bunty » Logged


Also 2nd home page using AltDashboard 6.81 at http://stillwaterweather.com/wx/2ndhome.php
chief-david
Educational Weather
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1283


Space Academy for Educators


WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2012, 02:06:02 PM »

we are the minority with weather. we watch it.

MOST DONT until it is too late.

Upping the descriptions, will not stop complacency?

Next they will want to put overweight people on sodas and dead people on cigarette packs.   Oh.... wait...
Logged

Vantage Pro Plus 6163    Wunderground KMNMINNE28     CWOP DW6947
Midwesternweather.net  twitter @RMSWeather     Facebook 
Skywarn Stormspotter
Robbinsdale, MN 55422@ 45 degrees North Latitude.
http://weather.rms.rdale.org/
HailHunter
Senior Contributor
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 288



« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2012, 12:42:50 AM »

This is something I brought up in another thread on the board here. I believe the answer is a resounding "yes." The better radar becomes and picking up rotation, the more warnings have to be issued (you can't split hairs over rotation, if you see it you have to issue it.)

The more times you issue it based on rotation that may or may not be on the ground, then the more times you are going to have a false alarm and eventually people are going to stop believing it.

It's not the National Weather Service's fault. It's the fault of people who don't stop and listen to the NWS explain the warning system.
Logged

Bushman
Forecaster
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3544


WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2012, 09:42:19 AM »

Think "The boy who cried WOLF!"
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 2.385 seconds with 19 queries.