WXforum.net
May 22, 2013, 10:23:31 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Members: 6617  •  Posts: 178612  •  Topics: 18127
Please welcome TheMOX, our newest member.
Welcome to the the new hosting for WXforum.net.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WS1090 and added the SRS100LX  (Read 1438 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
dman7800
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6




« on: March 18, 2012, 03:36:59 PM »

Hey all, I had a question for everyone.  Just got my WS1090 and added the SRS100LX.  I have attached a picture as it describes a million words. 

My question is this.  Am I better off leaving the thermo-hydro transmitter with the shield on the pole or under the eve of the garage?  My temps seem to be running a degree or two higher than the area.
Logged
SlowModem
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4510


WX @ 26.4 kbs


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2012, 05:40:03 PM »

Leave it there for a week and compare to the area.  Then move it to the other place for a week and compare.  I had holes all in my yard from where I moved sensors around when I first got mine.  Smile  But you have to give it time and see what the average is.
Logged

Greg Whitehead
Ten Mile, TN

http://wattsbarweather.net

DanS
Chiang Mai weather
Forecaster
*****
Online Online

Posts: 4301



WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2012, 07:13:12 PM »

Hey all, I had a question for everyone.  Just got my WS1090 and added the SRS100LX.  I have attached a picture as it describes a million words.  

My question is this.  Am I better off leaving the thermo-hydro transmitter with the shield on the pole or under the eve of the garage?  My temps seem to be running a degree or two higher than the area.

Is there an option for "plan C", thermo/hygro sensor away from the house completely and out in the open over a grassy area? (see:   http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/coop/standard.htm )
That shield upgrade was a good move on your part.

Besides NWS recommended guidelines stating this for siting, I have 2 stations running and one (D4009) is placed close as I can find to this suggested location. About 1/2 mile down the road is an airport METAR reporting station (VTCC) that I compare to. For a test I first set both of my stations out over the grass to get an idea how they would measure (1st pic). Now I have one of my stations under the eave on the north side of the house (D2642, second pic). You can see where the mid-day and afternoon sun that warms the ground below the "out-in-the-open" location is missed by mounting under the eave and out of the sun.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2012, 08:14:53 PM by DanS » Logged

Dan ThaiWx website
WS-2310/2810 WUHU WinXP 24/7
dman7800
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6




« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2012, 11:10:04 PM »

Yeah, in the summer the north side its on does stay shady.  I may just stick it under the eve next weekend.  I did notice I was on track with some in the area, some same and some 4 degrees cooler.

My yard is big but does go down to a natural swail which goes approx 6' below the house foundation so I was worried the winds wouldn't register right.  The height here is about 6' above roof lines.  
« Last Edit: March 22, 2012, 01:57:06 PM by dman7800 » Logged
Stetson1
Stetson Hills Weather
Senior Contributor
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 295



WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2012, 02:26:13 PM »

Every setup is a compromise. My unit sits just under the north side eave of my house. I extended the cable for the anemometer and put it 8 feet above my roof line to get the wind correct. Is my placement perfect, no. Given my small yard and all the trees around it is the best I can do, on the upside it is within a degree of a VP2 a mile away that is placed out in the open so I decided to keep it where it is. Perfect is the enemy of good as the saying goes.

Todd
Logged

  
Weather Underground PWS KCOCOLOR131
MADIS ID: D4524
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.1 seconds with 19 queries.
anything