WXforum.net
May 24, 2013, 07:25:49 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Members: 6620  •  Posts: 178805  •  Topics: 18140
Please welcome moranbahweather, our newest member.
Welcome to the the new hosting for WXforum.net.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Thoughts on Board Ranks  (Read 3470 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Farmtalk
Fitzweather
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3533



WWW
« Reply #25 on: December 07, 2011, 02:30:36 PM »

No Im not into the post count, I just like to be a part of the discussion Smile
Logged

"Make it simple but significant"

Administrator- www.fitzweather.com
Administrator- www.triviacre.com
saratogaWX
Administrator
Forecaster
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3748


Saratoga, CA, USA Weather - free PHP scripts


WWW
« Reply #26 on: December 07, 2011, 02:34:04 PM »

Just for reference, here are the current settings for 'rank' based on postings
Code:
                    Stars     Members     Required posts
Newbie                *        2005             0     
Member                *        2577             1     
Senior Member         **       101              50     
Contributor           ***      43               100     
Senior Contributor    ****     44               150     
Forecaster            *****    73               300     
and yes, it is just for fun.. no 'quality' is indicated by the ranking, just 'quantity'.

And.. postings in Chit-Chat, Posting Games, and Test Zone do not count.

We'd set this up based on the original weatherforum.net settings and haven't changed it since June, 2006 when the forum started.

Best regards,
Ken

Logged

Ken True/Saratoga, CA, USA main site: saratoga-weather.org
Davis Vantage Pro Plus - FARS, Boltek-PCI/NexStorm, GRLevel3, WD, WL, VWS, Cumulus, Meteohub
Free weather PHP scripts/website templates - update notifications on Twitter saratogaWXPHP
Axelvold
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1702



WWW
« Reply #27 on: December 07, 2011, 03:05:23 PM »

As more and more people come aboard, newer members may get the wrong impression of the rank of 'Forecaster'.  Shouldn't that be reserved for actual forecasters with appropriate training and not just anybody with a certain post count?  I know we have several Mets here.

Or just remove the ranking, it does not serve any purpose.
Logged

Lars Magnusson
Axelvold / Sweden
55° 57' 41" N / 13° 6' 1" E
WX Station: Davis Vantage Pro2 Plus


Farmtalk
Fitzweather
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3533



WWW
« Reply #28 on: December 07, 2011, 04:27:19 PM »

I dont think thats the answer....Why dont people just ignore them and let everyone have fun? Cool
Logged

"Make it simple but significant"

Administrator- www.fitzweather.com
Administrator- www.triviacre.com
DanS
Chiang Mai weather
Forecaster
*****
Online Online

Posts: 4305



WWW
« Reply #29 on: December 07, 2011, 06:57:06 PM »

I don't even notice them anymore until people start talking about them. Same with post counts.
Logged

Dan ThaiWx website
WS-2310/2810 WUHU WinXP 24/7
kray1000
Purveyor of wry
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1308



WWW
« Reply #30 on: December 07, 2011, 07:00:00 PM »

Just for reference, here are the current settings for 'rank' based on postings
Code:
                    Stars     Members     Required posts
Newbie                *        2005             0     
Member                *        2577             1     
Senior Member         **       101              50     
Contributor           ***      43               100     
Senior Contributor    ****     44               150     
Forecaster            *****    73               300     


I was so glad when I graduated from Seņor Contributor.  Made me feel a little younger.
Logged

Kevin Ray
Roanoke, VA

Wireless VP2, Stardot NetCam, ImageSalsa 2.0.12, MovieSalsa, Nexstorm, WASP2, Skymet, VWS14.01p33, WD 10.37N build 03
Farmtalk
Fitzweather
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3533



WWW
« Reply #31 on: December 07, 2011, 07:17:30 PM »

 Laughing Laughing Laughing

I could go with people as ranks, Like "Storm Master G (For Greg Forbes) as the top rank Very Happy
Logged

"Make it simple but significant"

Administrator- www.fitzweather.com
Administrator- www.triviacre.com
drstorm215
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #32 on: January 03, 2012, 05:59:20 PM »

As a relative "newbie" but "member", I can say that when scrolling through all the forums that I very much appreciate the ranks and post counts.
Maybe I'll learn not to put as much faith in you big posters Laughing, but I believe for those of us just getting around to this site, it helps seperate some of the "fluff" comments from those that have seen it all.
I do agree with the suggestion of being well read on the posts should count for something, but I also see the flip side of encouraging one to help by posting also....... Applause
Logged



Mike
Davis Vantage Pro 2 6152
cumulus
MADIS: DW9251
WU: KPABEARC3
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.097 seconds with 18 queries.