Thoughts on Board Ranks

(1/7) > >>

WeatherHost:
As more and more people come aboard, newer members may get the wrong impression of the rank of 'Forecaster'. Shouldn't that be reserved for actual forecasters with appropriate training and not just anybody with a certain post count? I know we have several Mets here.

kray1000:
We could replace that designation with "amateur weather educated-guesser", but I don't think it will fit.

neondesert:
Since a professionally trained "Meteorologist" is able to indicate this in their profile and/or next to their avatar, IMO it's a non-issue.

Besides, anyone can be a "Forecaster".

"Tomorrow will be sunny and dry here in Las Vegas" There, I just made a forecast.
And a darn good one I might add! ;)

Farmtalk:
I always thought the ranks should be more spread out...The top rank is 300 posts

neondesert:
Quote from: farmtalk on December 06, 2011, 07:34:34 PM

I always thought the ranks should be more spread out...The top rank is 300 posts

Personally, I don't see the need for them. They really don't serve any purpose.

Navigation

 Message Index