WXforum.net
June 18, 2013, 08:45:51 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Members: 6695  •  Posts: 181343  •  Topics: 18406
Please welcome KD0RII, our newest member.
Welcome to the the new hosting for WXforum.net.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Double Solar panel charging / VP2  (Read 625 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MEnJ_DK
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4




« on: December 20, 2011, 08:58:53 AM »

Hi,
I'm using a Wireless VP2 in Denmark and right now the sun-angle (NSA) are about 10º (that is, if we see the sun at all !)

I have a spare ISS cover with two solar panels, a left-over from a DFARS, and I would like double the charge capacity by using this cover instead.

Question:
Do I connect the solar panels in serie or parallel? - I do understand the difference, but how is the charge circuit designed in the ISS, - do I gain most charge capacity by increase the voltage or the current?

/Morten
Logged
Bushman
Forecaster
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3544


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2011, 09:19:37 AM »

Increasing the voltage is probably not a good idea.  Depending on how the circuit is designed an extra solar panel may not do any good since the current to the supercap is likely regulated.
Logged
dalecoy
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3532


WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2011, 11:07:18 AM »

Increasing the voltage is probably not a good idea. 

I agree with Bushman - connect the panels in parallel.  At your latitude, this should effectively double the charge that gets to the supercap.  More current is what you want.



Logged
johnd
Forecaster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1276


WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2011, 11:39:23 AM »

TBH I don't think it's necessary at all. The lithium battery still lasts 18-24 months at latitudes of 50-60N. Are you really that bothered to make it last longer? Possibly the summer months of  getting on 18 hours sunshine at least partially compensate for the 6-7 hours of winter sun.
Logged
PaulMy
Forecaster
*****
Online Online

Posts: 721



WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2011, 05:26:20 PM »

Quote
Are you really that bothered to make it last longer?
After 3.5 years on original battery, with everything still working perfect, I decided it was time to replace the battery in the ISS now rather than having to do it later when possibly covered in snow.  We get a fair amount of sun in the summer but many dull, snowy days in the winter yet battery has been good thus far.  Davis says not to expect the same life on the replacement.
Paul
Logged

Bushman
Forecaster
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3544


WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2011, 05:42:34 PM »

On what basis would Davis make that claim?  Lost efficiency of the solar panel.  Or something failing?
Logged
PaulMy
Forecaster
*****
Online Online

Posts: 721



WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2011, 10:38:00 PM »

Yes, that is what the customer service rep said, over time will be reduced life!

Paul
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.104 seconds with 19 queries.
anything