No, just that since the measured rain rate at the bucket will decrease when winds increase, there should be a variable computed by the software to compensate. But that might be too difficult.
Hmm... That's an interesting idea. The curve on the graph in the post up above is almost linear, close enough that the slope could be used for a velocity to rainfall compensation factors.
There are a couple of things that complicate applying a compensation. The first is velocity. Storm winds are, in my experience, almost never steady. They vary by quite a bit. So, they'd have to be averaged out. The slope of the curve is almost linear, so that might actually work.
However, the next problem is that rainfall is always measured in arrears. That is, the gauge only tells you how much has fallen in the past. For compensation to be useful, you'd have to know the time between the latest rain gauge tip and the one before it. That time will almost always vary as the storm progresses.
Then, you'd have to calculate the average wind speed for that time period, and use that to calculate or look up the rainfall compensation factor for that wind speed, multiply that times the rainfall in the period (probably 0.01") and then add that to the current rainfall.
It could be done, but that's a lot of work.