Does anyone know if this will work with Metobridge and/or WeatherDisplay?
You would have to sniff the data from the Access's wunderground feed.
I don't think the author of Meteobridge/Weatherbridge has any plans for that.
Access itself has the potential for supporting other weather networks, but it's up to Acurite to add them.
What is the insane deal with weather station makers insisting that you can only access YOUR DATA from THEIR CHOICE OF WEBSITES? As far as I am concerned this removes Atlas and virtually everything from Ambient Weather from consideration. It is absolutely CHEAPER to just include a USB port and let the OWNER decide what they want to do with THEIR data.
I'm sure that fanboys will screech at me, but AcuRite and Ambient have taken VERY SPECIFIC STEPS TO CONTROL YOUR DATA!
Sorry I have to step in and defend Ambient Weather. You can very easily upload your data anywhere you want with an Ambient station with a Meteobridge that they sell branded as a WeatherBridge. Couldn't be easier than that. No hacking, no tinkering loading custom firmwares. Just plug and play. Every Ambient station is capable of adding a Meteobridge (or WeatherBridge) by first adding the ObserverIP. They sell and support this solution with excellent customer support.
Are you drunk or just an employee of Ambient? You are HONESTLY DEFENDING them charging an EXTRA $180 for the WeatherBridge PLUS $37 for the ObserverIP just for the ability to send YOUR DATA WHERE YOU WANT IT?
"Hey guys! For the tidy sum of $216.98 PLUS $9.89 shipping (total of $243.79!) you can actually do whatever YOU WANT WITH YOUR DATA from the weather station that YOU BOUGHT!"
This reply has to be the single most idiotic attempt to defend a company I have ever read in my life!
I'm not an employee. Why not own up to your mistake that you made an uninformed inaccurate statement. A WeatherBridge is worth it if you don't have the experience to build a Meteobridge. The WeatherBridge may also be well worth it to someone that needs additional company support. Plus the WeatherBridge comes with an ambientweather.net license. Want it for half the price then make one yourself. The good thing is you have options. But to claim that Ambient Weather doesn't let you publish your data where you want is a false claim when they offer a well supported solution. Needing to add the right hardware/software is not unreasonable. So not sure where you are going with that. When you are wrong you wrong....don't dig yourself deeper. And this is my last post on this matter. I don't do the back and forth. You can have the last word. What's up with your station at 27 inHg?
Let's address your ad hominem attack FIRST. I have TWO PhD's - one in Electrical Engineering and one in Mechanical Engineering, so your patently false assertion regarding my skills and knowledge is nothing less than indicative of your inability to address the real issue, thus you choose to attack the person rather than the issue. Pathetic! I'm not surprised as the typical fanboi really has nothing more than false logic to rely upon.
Second, you are patently LYING when you claim that I falsely stated that "Ambient Weather doesn't let you publish your data where you want" - they CHARGE EXTRA AND REQUIRE you to purchase THIRD PARTY EQUIPMENT. Thus, AmbientWeather DOES NOT let you you publish your data where you want. The makers of MeteoBridge allow you to publish your data where THEY want, but even then they require you to pay for updates after two years. Tell me genius, how does forcing me to purchase third-party equipment to send my data where I want equate to giving me freedom of choice over my data?
The corollary would be for you to purchase a car, but the manufacturer would only allow you to drive it to a select group of pre-defined destinations unless you PAID THEM EXTRA for the PRIVILEGE of using the car that YOU PAID FOR to travel where YOU want.
I will own up to stating THE TRUTH, your inability to comprehend said truth is on you. Your refusal to continue discussing the matter in indicative of a closed mind. Being as YOU have made it perfectly clear that you are only capable of initiating ad hominem attacks, I am through discussing this with you, however, my decision to disengage is based upon the intelligence that it's fruitless to engage with those that cannot stick to the FACTS and attack the PERSON instead.