Richard,
I think what folks are trying to have you understand is that your use of parenthetical expressions actually makes what you are saying hard to understand.
One person's
"parenthetical expressions", I guess, are another's elements [in fact] important, where considering what they've hoped to convey, is all I have for you here more specific, "saratogaWx".
— Ken, if I may.
Regarding your broader assessment of my
"style of writing" above, as I view what I've written, preceding it, and where considering the ideas that I'd been asked to address if and where having hoped to show any type of more substantive response to what had been said about what I'd suggested pointed to otherwise regarding it, more recently, above, …
.. I've worked as best I've been able, to address, what's been pointed to.
— This, as concisely as possible, while speaking to each element of what had been being said about it.
Regarding the emphasis more specific that you've put on what other
"folks" are
"understanding", or otherwise, where
"first reading" my comments, .. While I can certainly appreciate this as being your perception, with my broader efforts where regarding/considering the general theme that I've entered into here within this thread not being meant to be anything more than - if certainly generated in earnest, projections, offered, submitted, and not as any type of either whether more formal or official output, and so with this idea, open for "discussion", ….
.. as I've suggested above, instead of my working to adjust either whether the general format of, or style where considering, my basic submissions
—pointing to what I feel main colder air mass might do where looked at more over-all and where looking more forward ahead in time, meteorologically, when I do, …
.. I'd much prefer that whomever reading my posts submitted, not perhaps being able to appreciate what I've had to say, simply ask me to clarify whatever for them.
More abstractly, … Granted,
"short" and
"to the point sentences" are certainly at times more
"easily" understood, than thinking expressed more linearly. (One thought lending to another, one following another.)
... With the
"sample" example that you've cited above, part of my efforts previous, to clarify my broader efforts, where considering the actual idea of prognosticating future and if broader cold air mass both movement together with distribution, the fact is, that I'd chosen a more "linear" path. (The sentence is grammatically correct. Do I really need to defend whether or not it makes sense. ?)
— In "short" (?), I certainly wish
"folks" would, instead of analyzing the
"style" in which I worked to convey what I've had in mind main "projections" wise and focused, where regarding broader colder air mass movement together with distribution, …
.. either whether, ask what I might mean where confused by it. This, or either, just ponder what I've said with perhaps checking its validity, even merit; this idea together with otherwise beyond it, where having [perhaps] appreciated its having proved valid and/or of merit, let me know that they've noted either of these ideas.
Finally. (?) And if I may, ..
http://www.wxforum.net/index.php?topic=18540.msg181547#msg181547