Author Topic: Station sitting a factor to consider when buying a station  (Read 3558 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Aardvark

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2305
  • Tonto to Lone Ranger : "never take off mask.
    • turned off
Station sitting a factor to consider when buying a station
« on: December 19, 2013, 09:53:08 AM »
I found this  http://www.srh.noaa.gov/images/epz/mesonet/CWOP-Siting.pdf  when doing a search on how to set personal weather stations.  It is a real good reference for personal weather stations.

It gives some factors to consider before purchasing a station, looking around the area that the station would be in and seeing what modifications and compromise might be needed if you had the station right now.   It then can influence and help you narrow you search.

Offline PatrioticRick

  • USAF Retired
  • Senior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 85
    • WeatherLink
Re: Station sitting a factor to consider when buying a station
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2014, 01:06:47 AM »
I found this  http://www.srh.noaa.gov/images/epz/mesonet/CWOP-Siting.pdf  when doing a search on how to set personal weather stations.  It is a real good reference for personal weather stations.

It gives some factors to consider before purchasing a station, looking around the area that the station would be in and seeing what modifications and compromise might be needed if you had the station right now.   It then can influence and help you narrow you search.

That's a real good link. =D>
CWOP=DW9069
MADIS=D9069
WU=KIDRIGBY2
PWS=RIGBYWX1
WxBug=p19372
WOW=373047692

Davis VP2 6152 w/WeatherLinkIP
WeatherLink 6.0.3



Offline Old Tele man

  • Singing in the rain...
  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
Re: Station sitting a factor to consider when buying a station
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2014, 01:35:08 PM »
Yep, if you live in the middle of a forest-of-trees, expecting the anemometer (and solar sensor) to be "accurate" is definitely wishful thinking!
• SYS: Davis VP2 Vue/WL-IP & Envoy8X/WL-USB;
• DBX2 & DBX1 Precision Digital Barographs
• CWOP: DW6988 - 2 miles NNE of Cortaro, AZ
• WU - KAZTUCSO202, Countryside

Offline Intheswamp

  • Early on one frosty morn'...
  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1485
  • Sure...I know enough to be dangerous, now.
    • Beeweather
Re: Station sitting a factor to consider when buying a station
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2014, 03:17:21 PM »
Yep, if you live in the middle of a forest-of-trees, expecting the anemometer (and solar sensor) to be "accurate" is definitely wishful thinking!
Yes, it won't be accurate for wind speed and direction found above the trees but it will be accurate for the micro-environment that it's situated in.  Very few of us have our stations in a perfect location and thus there are compromises to be accepted and expectations to be tempered. :)

Ed

Davis VP2, v3.12
Cumulus v1.9.4  Build 1079
Today's weather beats no weather at all!
www.beeweather.com
www.beausandbonnets.com

Offline Old Tele man

  • Singing in the rain...
  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
Re: Station sitting a factor to consider when buying a station
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2014, 03:31:10 PM »
...similarly, residential homes situated in "...close proximity..." (ie: most track homes) can also have problems, because neighbors' trees create wind curtains and eddies which WILL affect both wind speeds as well as directions. Also, the physical orientation of adjacent homes has effects: north-south alignments *favor* N/S wind patterns and *hinder* E/W wind patterns.

...of course, if you live in Tejas (or the flat-lands of Kansas), where your next-door neighbor is 50 miles away, you probably don't have any of these problems. (wink,wink)!
« Last Edit: January 28, 2014, 02:42:06 PM by Old Tele man »
• SYS: Davis VP2 Vue/WL-IP & Envoy8X/WL-USB;
• DBX2 & DBX1 Precision Digital Barographs
• CWOP: DW6988 - 2 miles NNE of Cortaro, AZ
• WU - KAZTUCSO202, Countryside

Offline DaleReid

  • Forecaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2002
    • Weather at Eau Claire, WI
Re: Station sitting a factor to consider when buying a station
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2014, 09:05:25 AM »
I think part of the price of the Davis goes towards the modularity and the add ons.  But as one person pointed out, over a hundred bucks for the interface chip?  Sheesh.  Arduino has a whole boat load of interfaces on board and a computer, too, and sells for $30.

As a slightly different slant, I would like to see simple set up and interfaces to allow the interested beginner to set up a reliable station quickly and have fun, perhaps getting bitten by the Wx station bug and doing more.  We used to have systems in schools around here.  Other than not seeing them or hearing about any science promoting education any more, what sign do our educators give to our children about being aware?  We used to have a 'team' that raised the flag, while another team read the temperature and barometer and recorded them in a log and graphed them.  Even the non-nerds were involved and I think were subtly encouraged to be aware.

Yet I know I'd like to have a proven accurate temperature measure, such as a really good quality glass thermometer.  Then the ability to get a wx program or very configurable station, that would allow me to build a table that for reading "x" from the station, that the measured real temperature is "Y" and display and report that value.  Same with humidity. Sort of like the look-up tables you had to make with Campbell Scientific stuff. But while I might futz with that for a few months or year to get a range of readings and tweak it over time, who in their right mind as a teen ager getting a station for a birthday or Christmas present would want to go to that length, or what difference does it make? 

Site to site variations really make a difference.  Watch your car thermometer as you drive hilly country to see two or three degree changes on the road.  Yet a portable reliable standard thermometer is a must.  We have one radio station in the area that for years was five to seven degrees colder every winter morning than even the neighbors with good equipment or the surrounding stations (when they really had stations and didn't just read off the AWOS or airport temps.  I think they fudged it just to be the most extreme.  So we do have confusion as to what is accurate. 

Are glass mercury thermometers linear across their whole range any more, or are they just close for the ten degrees on each side of their certified temperature?
ECWx.info
&
ECWx.info/t/index.php

 

anything