As a matter of fact that was here and the problem was addressed.
Was here? You mean on the forum? And addressing the problem means the problem is no more or never was?
No matter how you may belittle the fact, it shows there are other factors rather than just passive vs. fan aspiration, and that even expensive equipment has its problems. What you don't seem to understand is that there are other climates and situations rather than yours, or even than the places supposedly scientific studies have been conducted at. A quick glance at at least one of those studies says that the maximum windspeed never got over 5mph, so you really think I should run out and buy the supposedly "necessary" fan when I don't live in such an area and that I should get excited over a possible rare 1 or 2 degree over reading?
Maybe before you mandate that everyone be required to get a FARS, you should mandate inspections to make sure that everyone's equipment is sited properly, I think that has far more of an effect on the data.
I know this issue has been raised over and over again, and some people, like me, just aren't going to see the need for added expense and problems for a marginal increase in accuracy, and others are going to continue to tell everyone that a FARS is absolutely, positively necessary; and if you don't have one you're not part of the elite and your readings are worthless.